Am. J. Bot. Visit Plant Cell Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ellison, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gotelli, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ellison, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gotelli, N. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ellison, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gotelli, N. J.
(American Journal of Botany. 2004;91:1930-1935.)
© 2004 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Systematics and Phytogeography

Morphological variation in Sarracenia purpurea (Sarraceniaceae): geographic, environmental, and taxonomic correlates1

Aaron M. Ellison2,5, Hannah L. Buckley3,6, Thomas E. Miller3 and Nicholas J. Gotelli4

2Harvard University, Harvard Forest, P.O. Box 68, Petersham, Massachusetts 01366 USA; 3Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306 USA; 4Department of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05405 USA

Geographic variation in morphology reflects phenotypic responses to environmental gradients and evolutionary history of populations and species and may indicate local or regional changes in environmental conditions. The pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea) illustrates these principles. At local scales, its morphology reflects nutrient availability. At points along its broad geographic range (from Florida to northern Canada) morphology has been used to distinguish subspecies and varieties, but there has been no detailed study of the continuum of morphological variation across this entire range. Patterns of morphological variation in S. purpurea were characterized as a function of climatic and environmental conditions at 39 sites spanning its range. Differences in pitcher size and shape were strongly correlated with temperature, annual precipitation, and availability of ammonium and calcium in peat pore water. Pitcher shape (lip width, mouth diameter, and pitcher width) in Florida panhandle populations differed significantly from pitcher shape of all other populations, even after accounting for environmental correlations. In contrast, the northern and southern subspecies of S. purpurea (the latter exclusive of the Florida panhandle populations) cannot be distinguished based on these morphological measurements alone. These results support a recent proposal that identifies the Florida populations as a distinct species, Sarracenia rosea.

Key Words: carnivorous plants • geography • morphology • phylogeography • Sarracenia purpureaSarracenia rosea




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
G. Ne'eman, R. Ne'eman, and A. M. Ellison
Limits to reproductive success of Sarracenia purpurea (Sarraceniaceae)
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2006; 93(11): 1660 - 1666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.