Am. J. Bot.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Husband, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Husband, B. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Husband, B. C.
(American Journal of Botany. 2004;91:1802-1808.)
© 2004 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Population Biology

Maternal and paternal contributions to the fitness of hybrids between red and white mulberry (Morus, Moraceae)1

Kevin S. Burgess2,4 and Brian C. Husband3

2Biology Department, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904-4328 USA; 3Department of Botany, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1

The fitness of hybrids depends on the genetic disparity between parental taxa and the magnitude of their nuclear and non-nuclear contributions. To estimate the role of non-nuclear effects, we crossed red (R), white (W) and hybrid (H) mulberry in all combinations and compared the magnitude of maternal and paternal effects on offspring fitness (seed set, germination, survival and aboveground biomass) in a greenhouse environment. Variation in offspring fitness was determined largely by the identity of the maternal parent; specifically, progeny with white mothers had the highest cumulative fitness. As fathers, red, white, and hybrid mulberry had no effect on fitness, and maternal x paternal interactions were significant only for survival. Individual cross-types differed significantly for all fitness components except seed set. Offspring from hybrid crosses (W x R, H x R, H x W) often differed from at least one of the within-parent crosses (W x W, R x R) as well as from other hybrid crosses, although their fitness values never exceeded the most fit parent. Reciprocal crosses differed in only two of 15 possible parental combinations: W x H (cumulative fitness) and W x R (aboveground biomass). Overall, the strong asymmetry in magnitude of maternal and paternal effects suggests that fitness of hybrid mulberry is governed largely by non-nuclear, parental effects.

Key Words: common garden • cytonuclear interactions • cytoplasmic contributions • hybridization • maternal effects • Moraceae • Morus • non-nuclear effects • nuclear contributions • paternal effects




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. A. Wu and D. R. Campbell
Leaf physiology reflects environmental differences and cytoplasmic background in Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) hybrids
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2007; 94(11): 1804 - 1812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
M. Garbelotto, P. Gonthier, and G. Nicolotti
Ecological Constraints Limit the Fitness of Fungal Hybrids in the Heterobasidion annosum Species Complex
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., October 1, 2007; 73(19): 6106 - 6111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
D. L. Marshall, J. Reynolds, N. J. Abrahamson, H. L. Simpson, M. G. Barnes, J. S. Medeiros, S. Walsh, D. M. Oliveras, and J. J. Avritt
Do differences in plant and flower age change mating patterns and alter offspring fitness in Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae)?
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2007; 94(3): 409 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.