Am. J. Bot. Large Type Edition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Bruhl, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Bruhl, J. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Bruhl, J. J.
(American Journal of Botany. 2004;91:24-36.)
© 2004 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Structure and Development

Sympodial structure of spikelets in the tribe Schoeneae (Cyperaceae)1

Xiufu Zhang2,4, Karen L. Wilson3 and Jeremy J. Bruhl2,5

2Botany, The University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia;and 3National Herbarium of NSW, Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney, Mrs Macquaries Road, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia

Spikelet morphology of 250 specimens of 47 species of Schoeneae was examined using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. We confirmed that spikelet structure in Schoeneae is cymose with a sympodial "rachilla." Monopodial spikelets, as described by most current literature, were not found in Schoeneae. Prophylls are not always present in sympodial spikelets and cannot be used to determine whether a spikelet is sympodial or monopodial. Spikelets of Schoeneae develop acropetally, and the uppermost glume may or may not produce a flower. The last feature may be variable within species and within individual plants, so presence or absence of this flower is not an indication of sympodial or monopodial spikelet structure in Schoeneae. Relative position of flower, glume, and axis is a reliable criterion to judge whether spikelets are sympodial or monopodial. In some species of Schoenus and in Ptilothrix, formation of the arch-shaped base of the fertile glume relates to the shape of the inclined nodes on which the glume grows. This study highlights the need to reinvestigate spikelet structure in other tribes of Cyperaceae.

Key Words: Cyperaceae • monopodial • prophyll • rachilla • Rhynchosporeae • Schoeneae • spikelet • sympodial




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. H. Richards, J. J. Bruhl, and K. L. Wilson
Flower or spikelet? Understanding the morphology and development of reproductive structures in Exocarya (Cyperaceae, Mapanioideae, Chrysitricheae)
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2006; 93(9): 1241 - 1250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. I. Baksh and J. H. Richards
An architectural model for Eleocharis: morphology and development of Eleocharis cellulosa (Cyperaceae)
Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2006; 93(5): 707 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.