Am. J. Bot.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caruso, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ridley, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Caruso, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ridley, C. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Caruso, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ridley, C. E.
(American Journal of Botany. 2003;90:1333-1340.)
© 2003 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Reproductive Biology

Natural selection on floral traits of Lobelia (Lobeliaceae): spatial and temporal variation1

Christina M. Caruso2,4, S. Brook Peterson3,5 and Caroline E. Ridley3,6

2Departments of Biology and Mathematics, Grinnell College, Grinnell, Iowa 50112 USA; 3Department of Biology, Grinnell College, Grinnell, Iowa 50112 USA

The strength and direction of natural selection on floral traits can vary spatially and temporally because of variation in the biotic and abiotic environment. High spatial variation in selection should lead to differentiation of floral traits among populations. In contrast, high temporal variation in selection should retard the evolution of population-specific floral phenotypes. To determine the relative importance of spatial vs. temporal variation in natural selection, we measured phenotypic selection on seven floral traits of the wildflowers Lobelia cardinalis and L. siphilitica in 1999 and 2000. Lobelia cardinalis experienced significant temporal variation in selection, whereas L. siphilitica experienced spatial variation in selection on the same traits. This variation in selection on floral traits was associated with spatial and temporal differences in the soil microenvironment. Although few studies of natural selection include spatial or temporal replicates, our results suggest that such replication is critical for understanding the distribution of phenotypes in nature.

Key Words: Lobelia cardinalisLobelia siphilitica • Lobeliaceae • natural selection • phenotypic selection • pollination • spatial variation • temporal variation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. M. Caruso
Plasticity of inflorescence traits in Lobelia siphilitica (Lobeliaceae) in response to soil water availability
Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2006; 93(4): 531 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
D. E. Giblin
Variation in floral longevity between populations of Campanula rotundifolia (Campanulaceae) in response to fitness accrual rate manipulation
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2005; 92(10): 1714 - 1722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.