HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (26) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Taylor, D. L. Articles by Hodges, S. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Taylor, D. L. Articles by Hodges, S. A. Agricola Articles by Taylor, D. L. Articles by Hodges, S. A.

Divergence in mycorrhizal specialization within Hexalectris spicata (Orchidaceae), a nonphotosynthetic desert orchid¹

²Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106 USA; ³Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 USA

Evidence is accumulating for specialized yet evolutionarily dynamic associations between orchids and their mycorrhizal fungi. However, the frequency of tight mycorrhizal specificity and the phylogenetic scale of changes in specificity within the Orchidaceae are presently unknown. We used microscopic observations and PCR-based methods to address these questions in three taxa of nonphotosynthetic orchids within the Hexalectris spicata complex. Fungal ITS RFLP analysis and sequences of the ITS and nuclear LSU ribosomal gene fragments allowed us to identify the fungi colonizing 25 individuals and 50 roots. Thanatephorus ochraceus (Ceratobasidiaceae) was an occasional colonizer of mycorrhizal roots and nonmycorrhizal rhizomes. Members of the Sebacinaceae were the primary mycorrhizal fungi in every Hexalectris root and were phylogenetically intermixed with ectomycorrhizal taxa. These associates fell into six ITS RFLP types labeled B through G. Types B, C, D, and G were found in samples of H. spicata var. spicata, while only type E was found in H. spicata var. arizonica and only type F was found in H. revoluta. These results provide preliminary evidence for divergence in mycorrhizal specificity between these two closely related orchid taxa. We hypothesize that mycorrhizal interactions have contributed to the evolutionary diversification of the Orchidaceae.

Key Words: Hexalectris spicata • host-shift • ITS • myco-heterotrophy • mycorrhizal specificity • nLSU • Orchidaceae • Rhizoctonia • Sebacina

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. J. Waterman and M. I. Bidartondo Deception above, deception below: linking pollination and mycorrhizal biology of orchids J. Exp. Bot., March 2, 2008; (2008) erm366v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. P. Shefferson, T. Kull, and K. Tali Mycorrhizal interactions of orchids colonizing Estonian mine tailings hills Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2008; 95(2): 156 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Porras-Alfaro and P. Bayman Mycorrhizal fungi of Vanilla: diversity, specificity and effects on seed germination and plant growth Mycologia, July 1, 2007; 99(4): 510 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-M. Moncalvo, R. H. Nilsson, B. Koster, S. M. Dunham, T. Bernauer, P. B. Matheny, T. M. Porter, S. Margaritescu, M. Weiss, S. Garnica, et al. The cantharelloid clade: dealing with incongruent gene trees and phylogenetic reconstruction methods Mycologia, November 1, 2006; 98(6): 937 - 948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]