Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cooke, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cooke, T. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cooke, T. J.
(American Journal of Botany. 2003;90:1131-1143.)
© 2003 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Development and Morphogenesis

Geometrical relationships specifying the phyllotactic pattern of aquatic plants1

Wanda J. Kelly2 and Todd J. Cooke

Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742 USA

The complete range of various phyllotaxes exemplified in aquatic plants provide an opportunity to characterize the fundamental geometrical relationships operating in leaf patterning. A new polar-coordinate model was used to characterize the correlation between the shapes of shoot meristems and the arrangements of young leaf primordia arising on those meristems. In aquatic plants, the primary geometrical relationship specifying spiral vs. whorled phyllotaxis is primordial position: primordia arising on the apical dome (as defined by displacement angles {theta} ≤ 90° during maximal phase) are often positioned in spiral patterns, whereas primordia arising on the subtending axis (as defined by displacement angles of {theta} ≥ 90° during maximal phase) are arranged in whorled patterns. A secondary geometrical relationship derived from the literature shows an inverse correlation between the primordial size : available space ratio and the magnitude of the Fibonacci numbers in spiral phyllotaxis or the number of leaves per whorl in whorled phyllotaxis. The data available for terrestrial plants suggest that their phyllotactic patterning may also be specified by these same geometrical relationships. Major exceptions to these correlations are attributable to persistent embryonic patterning, leaflike structures arising from stipules, congenital splitting of young primordia, and/or non-uniform elongating of internodes. The geometrical analysis described in this paper provides the morphological context for interpreting the phenotypes of phyllotaxis mutants and for constructing realistic models of the underlying mechanisms responsible for generating phyllotactic patterns.

Key Words: aquatic plants • geometrical model • phyllotaxis • shoot apical meristem




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
D. Kwiatkowska
Structural integration at the shoot apical meristem: models, measurements, and experiments
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2004; 91(9): 1277 - 1293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.