Am. J. Bot. Cross-Journal Searching
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chase, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chase, M. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chase, M. W.
(American Journal of Botany. 2003;90:1071-1086.)
© 2003 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Systematics

Phylogenetic relationships in Cyperaceae subfamily Mapanioideae inferred from pollen and plastid DNA sequence data1

David A. Simpson2,5, Carol A. Furness2, Trevor R. Hodkinson3, A. Muthama Muasya4 and Mark W. Chase2

2Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AB, UK; 3Department of Botany, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland; 4East African Herbarium, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 45166-00100, Nairobi, Kenya

Cyperaceae are the third largest monocotyledon family, with considerable economic and conservation importance. In subfamily Mapanioideae there is particular specialization of the inflorescence into units termed spicoids. The structural homology of the spicoid is difficult to interpret, making determination of intrafamilial relationships problematic. To address this, pollen from eight species in Mapanioideae was investigated using light microscopy and scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Pollen development was also examined to identify the type of pollen present in these species. We also analyzed DNA sequence data using the trnL-F and rps16 regions from 25 genera and 35 species of Cyperaceae, Juncaceae, and Thurniaceae. Two types of pollen, Mapania-type and pseudomonad, were identifed. Analysis of combined DNA and pollen data resolved a clade sister to the rest of Cyperaceae, corresponding to Mapanioideae. Within this, two further clades were resolved. One comprised taxa assigned to tribe Hypolytreae, which had Mapania-type pollen. The other comprised taxa mainly assigned to tribe Chrysitricheae, but included two taxa from Hypolytreae, Capitularina and Exocarya. All taxa in this clade had pseudomonad pollen. Thus new groupings within the subfamily have been discovered based on the specialization of some taxa in terms of their pollination biology.

Key Words: Chrysitricheae • Cyperaceae • Hypolytreae • Mapanioideae • phylogenetics, pollen • pseudomonad • rps16trnL-F




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. H. Richards, J. J. Bruhl, and K. L. Wilson
Flower or spikelet? Understanding the morphology and development of reproductive structures in Exocarya (Cyperaceae, Mapanioideae, Chrysitricheae)
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2006; 93(9): 1241 - 1250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
A. VRIJDAGHS, P. GOETGHEBEUR, E. SMETS, and A. M. MUASYA
The Floral Scales in Hellmuthia (Cyperaceae, Cyperoideae) and Paramapania (Cyperaceae, Mapanioideae): An Ontogenetic Study
Ann. Bot., September 1, 2006; 98(3): 619 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. Shaw, E. B. Lickey, J. T. Beck, S. B. Farmer, W. Liu, J. Miller, K. C. Siripun, C. T. Winder, E. E. Schilling, and R. L. Small
The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2005; 92(1): 142 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.