Am. J. Bot. Subscribe to E-TOCs
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeFalco, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nowak, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DeFalco, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nowak, R. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by DeFalco, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nowak, R. S.
(American Journal of Botany. 2003;90:1045-1053.)
© 2003 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Ecology

Are Mojave Desert annual species equal? Resource acquisition and allocation for the invasive grass Bromus madritensis subsp. rubens (Poaceae) and two native species1

Lesley A. DeFalco2,4, David R. Bryla3, Vickie Smith-Longozo2 and Robert S. Nowak2

2Department of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Mail Stop 370, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557 USA; 3U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Water Management Research Laboratory, 9611 South Riverbend Avenue, Parlier, California 93648 USA

Abundance of invasive plants is often attributed to their ability ot outcompete native species. We compared resource acquisition and allocation of the invasive annual grass Bromus madritensis subsp. rubens with that of two native Mojave Desert annuals, Vulpia octoflora and Descurainia pinnata, in a glasshouse experiment. Each species was grown in monoculture at two densities and two levels of N availability to compare how these annuals capture resources and to understand their relative sensitivities to environmental change. During >4 mo of growth, Bromus used water more rapidly and had greater biomass and N content than the natives, partly because of its greater root-surface area and its exploitation of deep soils. Bromus also had greater N uptake, net assimilation and transpiration rates, and canopy area than Vulpia. Resource use by Bromus was less sensitive to changes in N availability or density than were the natives. The two native species in this study produced numerous small seeds that tended to remain dormant, thus ensuring escape of offspring from unfavorable germination conditions; Bromus produced fewer but larger seeds that readily germinated. Collectively, these traits give Bromus the potential to rapidly establish in diverse habitats of the Mojave Desert, thereby gaining an advantage over coexisting native species.

Key Words: Bromus madritensis subsp. rubens • desert ephemerals • introduced annual grasses • Mojave Desert • nitrogen uptake • plant biomass • Poaceae • root system • seed production • Vulpia octoflora • water uptake







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.