Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morand-Prieur, M.-E.
Right arrow Articles by Frascaria-Lacoste, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Morand-Prieur, M.-E.
Right arrow Articles by Frascaria-Lacoste, N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Morand-Prieur, M.-E.
Right arrow Articles by Frascaria-Lacoste, N.
(American Journal of Botany. 2003;90:949-953.)
© 2003 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Brief Communications

Males outcompete hermaphrodites for seed siring success in controlled crosses in the polygamous Fraxinus excelsior (Oleaceae)1

Marie-Elise Morand-Prieur2, Christian Raquin, Jacqui A. Shykoff and Nathalie Frascaria-Lacoste

Laboratoire Ecologie, Systématique et Evolution (ESE), UMR CNRS-ENGREF 8079, Bâtiment 360, Université Paris-Sud, 91 405 Orsay Cedex, France

Polygamy (including trioecy and subdioecy), the co-occurrence of males, hermaphrodites, and females in natural populations, is a rare and poorly studied breeding system expressed in Fraxinus excelsior L. (Oleaceae), a wind-pollinated tree. Here we investigate siring ability of pollen from male vs. hermaphrodite individuals to better understand this sex polymorphism. We conducted single-donor and two-donor pollination experiments and compared both fruit set and seed siring success, assessed with polymorphic microsatellite markers, of male and hermaphrodite individuals. Single pollen donor crosses allowed us to verify the male function of hermaphrodites. However, pollen from hermaphrodites was much less proficient than male pollen, with males siring 10 times as many fruits in single donor pollination treatments. This result was strengthened by the surprisingly low reproductive success of hermaphrodites in pollen competition conditions: of the 110 seedlings analyzed three were selfed and only one was sired by the hermaphrodite donor. The remaining 106 were sired by the male pollen donor. These results raise the question of the maintenance of male fertility in hermaphrodites in Fraxinus excelsior. Male function of hermaphrodites in this species now needs to be assessed under field conditions.

Key Words: androdioecy • Fraxinus excelsior • male reproductive success • microsatellites • Oleaceae • paternity assignment • pollen competition • polygamous mating system • trioecy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
G. Gleiser, J. G. Segarra-Moragues, J. R. Pannell, and M. Verdu
Siring Success and Paternal Effects in Heterodichogamous Acer opalus
Ann. Bot., May 1, 2008; 101(7): 1017 - 1026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
jashsHome page
A. Diaz, A. Martin, P. Rallo, and R. De la Rosa
Cross-compatibility of the Parents as the Main Factor for Successful Olive Breeding Crosses
J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., November 1, 2007; 132(6): 830 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
D. L. Marshall, J. Reynolds, N. J. Abrahamson, H. L. Simpson, M. G. Barnes, J. S. Medeiros, S. Walsh, D. M. Oliveras, and J. J. Avritt
Do differences in plant and flower age change mating patterns and alter offspring fitness in Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae)?
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2007; 94(3): 409 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.