Am. J. Bot.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zoro Bi, I.
Right arrow Articles by Baudoin, J.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zoro Bi, I.
Right arrow Articles by Baudoin, J.-P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zoro Bi, I.
Right arrow Articles by Baudoin, J.-P.
(American Journal of Botany. 2003;90:897-904.)
© 2003 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Population Biology

Population genetic structure of wild Phaseolus lunatus (Fabaceae), with special reference to population sizes1

Irié Zoro Bi2, Alain Maquet3 and Jean-Pierre Baudoin4,5

2UFR des Sciences de la Nature, Université d'Abobo-Adjamé, 02 BP 801 Abidjan 02, Côte d'Ivoire; 3European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre, Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, Retieseweg, B-2440 Geel, Belgium; 4Unité de Phytotechnie tropicale et d'Horticulture, Faculté universitaire des Sciences agronomiques, 2, Passage des Déportés, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium

To set up an in situ conservation strategy for Phaseolus lunatus, we analyzed the genetic structure of 29 populations in the Central Valley of Costa Rica. Using 22 enzyme loci, we quantified the proportion of polymorphic loci (Pp), the mean number of alleles per locus (A), and the mean effective number of alleles per locus (Ae), which equaled to 10.32%, 1.10, and 1.05, respectively. The total heterozygosity (HT), the intrapopulation genetic diversity (HS), and the interpopulation genetic diversity (DST) were 0.193, 0.082, and 0.111, respectively. The genotypic composition of the analyzed populations showed a deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg proportions (FIT = 0.932). This disequilibrium was due to either genetic differentiation between populations (FST = 0.497) or nonrandom mating within populations (FIS = 0.866). From the level of genetic differentiation between populations and the private alleles frequencies estimates, gene flow was calculated: NmW = 0.398 and NmS = 0.023, respectively. The results suggested that wild Lima bean maintains most of its isozyme variation among populations. Significant positive correlation was observed between population size and Pp, A, and Ho (observed heterozygosity), whereas no correlation was observed with the average fixation index of population (F). The loss of genetic variability in populations was attributed to inbreeding and the bottleneck effects that characterized the target populations. In situ conservation and management procedures for wild Lima bean are discussed.

Key Words: Costa Rica • Fabaceae • gene flow • genetic diversity • in situ conservation • isozymes • Lima bean • Phaseolus lunatus • population size




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. Martinez-Castillo, D. Zizumbo-Villarreal, P. Gepts, and P. Colunga-GarciaMarin
Gene Flow and Genetic Structure in the Wild-Weedy-Domesticated Complex of Phaseolus lunatus L. in its Mesoamerican Center of Domestication and Diversity
Crop Sci., January 22, 2007; 47(1): 58 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. Martinez-Castillo, D. Zizumbo-Villarreal, P. Gepts, P. Delgado-Valerio, and P. Colunga-GarciaMarin
Structure and Genetic Diversity of Wild Populations of Lima Bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) from the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico
Crop Sci., March 27, 2006; 46(3): 1071 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.