Am. J. Bot. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Diggle, P. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Diggle, P. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Diggle, P. K.
(American Journal of Botany. 2003;90:707-715.)
© 2003 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Reproductive Biology

Diversification of andromonoecy in Solanum section Lasiocarpa (Solanaceae): the roles of phenotypic plasticity and architecture1

Jill S. Miller2 and Pamela K. Diggle

Department of Environmental, Population, and Organismic Biology, University of Colorado, Campus Box #334, Boulder, Colorado 80309 USA

Quantitative analyses of sexual expression show extensive interspecific variation in the strength of andromonoecy (proportions of hermaphroditic and staminate flowers) among Solanum species in the monophyletic section Lasiocarpa. The roles of phenotypic plasticity and inter- and intra-inflorescence architecture in the diversification of andromonoecy within this small clade were analyzed. Four species that represent a range of expression of andromonoecy were examined. Staminate flowers produced within inflorescences ranged from 3% (S. candidum) to 7% (S. ferox) in weakly andromonoecious species and from 39% (S. pseudolulo) to 60% (S. quitoense) in more strongly andromonoecious species. Manipulation of fruit set on clonal replicates of multiple genotypes demonstrated variation among species for phenotypic plasticity. The strongly andromonoecious species, S. pseudolulo and S. quitoense, were not plastic and produced a large proportion of staminate flowers regardless of fruiting treatment, whereas S. candidum and S. ferox were phenotypically plastic and produced significantly more staminate flowers in the presence of developing fruit. Staminate flower production of all four species varied both within and among inflorescences. A greater proportion of staminate flowers were produced in distal (later produced) inflorescences. Within inflorescences, hermaphroditic flowers occurred in basal positions, whereas staminate flowers, when produced, occurred more distally. This pattern of staminate flower production is qualitatively the same in all species investigated; however, quantitative variation in the transition from hermaphroditic to staminate flower production within and among inflorescences is associated with variation in the strength of andromonoecy. At least three factors have contributed to the diversification of andromonoecy in section Lasiocarpa including the presence or absence of phenotypic plasticity in response to fruit set, quantitative variation in intra- and inter-inflorescence architectural effects, and total flower production.

Key Words: andromonoecy • architecture • development • phenotypic plasticity • sexual systems • Solanaceae • Solanum




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M{a} L. Buide
Disentangling the causes of intrainflorescence variation in floral traits and fecundity in the hermaphrodite Silene acutifolia
Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2008; 95(4): 490 - 497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
E. Narbona, P. L. Ortiz, and M. Arista
Sexual Dimorphism in the Andromonoecious Euphorbia nicaeensis: Effects of Gender and Inflorescence Development
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(5): 717 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. S. Miller and P. K. Diggle
Correlated evolution of fruit size and sexual expression in andromonoecious Solanum sections Acanthophora and Lasiocarpa (Solanaceae)
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2007; 94(10): 1706 - 1715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
P. K. Diggle and J. S. Miller
Architectural effects mimic floral sexual dimorphism in Solanum (Solanaceae)
Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2004; 91(12): 2030 - 2040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. GUITIAN, M. MEDRANO, and J. E. OTI
Variation in Floral Sex Allocation in Polygonatum odoratum (Liliaceae)
Ann. Bot., September 1, 2004; 94(3): 433 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. L. BUIDE
Intra-inflorescence Variation in Floral Traits and Reproductive Success of the Hermaphrodite Silene acutifolia
Ann. Bot., September 1, 2004; 94(3): 441 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.