|
|
||||||||
|
What's this? |
Systematics |
2Botanisches Institut und Botanischer Garten, Universitaet Wien, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Vienna, Austria; 3Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK; 4The Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK
Phylogenetic analyses of Meliaceae, including representatives of all four currently recognized subfamilies and all but two tribes (32 genera and 35 species, respectively), were carried out using DNA sequence data from three regions: plastid genes rbcL, matK (partial), and nuclear 26S rDNA (partial). Individual and combined phylogenetic analyses were performed for the rbcL, matK, and 26S rDNA data sets. Although the percentage of informative characters is highest in the segment of matK sequenced, rbcL provides the greatest number of informative characters of the three regions, resulting in the best resolved trees. Results of parsimony analyses support the recognition of only two subfamilies (Melioideae and Swietenioideae), which are sister groups. Melieae are the only tribe recognized previously that are strongly supported as monophyletic. The members of the two small monogeneric subfamilies, Quivisianthe and Capuronianthus, fall within Melioideae and Swietenioideae, respectively, supporting their taxonomic inclusion in these groups. Furthermore, the data indicate a close relationship between Aglaieae and Guareeae and a possible monophyletic origin of Cedreleae of Swietenioideae. For Trichilieae (Melioideae) and Swietenieae (Swietenioideae) lack of monophyly is indicated.
Key Words: matK Meliaceae nuclear and plastid DNA phylogeny rbcL 26S rDNA Sapindales
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Groppo, J. R. Pirani, M. L. F. Salatino, S. R. Blanco, and J. A. Kallunki Phylogeny of Rutaceae based on twononcoding regions from cpDNA Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2008; 95(8): 985 - 1005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. F. Gouvea, M. C. Dornelas, and A. P. M. Rodriguez Floral Development in the Tribe Cedreleae (Meliaceae, Sub-family Swietenioideae): Cedrela and Toona Ann. Bot., January 1, 2008; 101(1): 39 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. Muellner, R. Samuel, M. W. Chase, C. M. Pannell, and H. Greger Aglaia (Meliaceae): an evaluation of taxonomic concepts based on DNA data and secondary metabolites Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2005; 92(3): 534 - 543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. J. Barfuss, R. Samuel, W. Till, and T. F. Stuessy Phylogenetic relationships in subfamily Tillandsioideae (Bromeliaceae) based on DNA sequence data from seven plastid regions Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2005; 92(2): 337 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Shaw, E. B. Lickey, J. T. Beck, S. B. Farmer, W. Liu, J. Miller, K. C. Siripun, C. T. Winder, E. E. Schilling, and R. L. Small The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2005; 92(1): 142 - 166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |