Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonser, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Aarssen, L. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bonser, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Aarssen, L. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bonser, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Aarssen, L. W.
(American Journal of Botany. 2003;90:404-412.)
© 2003 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Ecology

Allometry and development in herbaceous plants: functional responses of meristem allocation to light and nutrient availability1

Stephen P. Bonser2 and Lonnie W. Aarssen3

Department of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 3N6

We examined the relationship between meristem allocation and plant size for four annual plant species: Arabidopsis thaliana, Arenaria serphyllifolia, Brassica rapa, and Chaenorrhinum minus. Gradients of light and nutrient availability were used to obtain a range of plant sizes for each of these species. Relative allocation to reproductive, inactive, and growth meristems were used to measure reproductive effort, apical dominance, and branching intensity, respectively. We measured allocation to each of these three meristem fates at weekly intervals throughout development and at final developmental stage. At all developmental stages reproductive effort and branching intensity tended to increase with increasing plant size (i.e., due to increasing resource availability) and apical dominance tended to decrease with increasing plant size. We interpret these responses as a strategy for plants to maximize fitness across a range of environments. In addition, significant differences in meristem response among species may be important in defining the range of habitats in which a species can exist and may help explain patterns of species competition and coexistence in habitats with variable resource availability.

Key Words: allometry • development • functional response • light gradient • meristem allocation • nutrient gradient




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
G. P. Cheplick
A modular approach to biomass allocation in an invasive annual (Microstegium vimineum; Poaceae)
Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2006; 93(4): 539 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J.-M. BOUVET, P. VIGNERON, and A. SAYA
Phenotypic Plasticity of Growth Trajectory and Ontogenic Allometry in Response to Density for Eucalyptus Hybrid Clones and Families
Ann. Bot., October 1, 2005; 96(5): 811 - 821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
P. A. Fay and H. L. Throop
Branching responses in Silphium integrifolium (Asteraceae) following mechanical or gall damage to apical meristems and neighbor removal
Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2005; 92(6): 954 - 959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. K. Rice and N. Schneider
Cushion size, surface roughness, and the control of water balance and carbon flux in the cushion moss Leucobryum glaucum (Leucobryaceae)
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2004; 91(8): 1164 - 1172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
V. Paquin and L. W. Aarssen
Allometric gender allocation in Ambrosia Artemisiifolia (Asteraceae) has adaptive plasticity
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2004; 91(3): 430 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.