Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hik, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cahill, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hik, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cahill, J. F., Jr
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hik, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cahill, J. F.
(American Journal of Botany. 2003;90:270-277.)
© 2003 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Ecology

Prevalence and predictability of handling effects in field studies: results from field experiments and a meta-analysis1

David S. Hik2, Melissa Brown, Anna Dabros, Jackie Weir and James F. Cahill Jr

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9 Canada

Various effects on plant growth associated with handling or touching plants are well documented from greenhouse and laboratory studies, but are generally unknown or ignored under field conditions. We examined the prevalence of the effects of handling, at levels typical of many ecological experiments, on aboveground biomass and damage by invertebrate herbivores for a total of 16 common species from three plant communities in western Canada. Significant effects of handling were observed in the alpine meadow and grassland, but not in the boreal forest. Handling reduced aboveground biomass and increased the mean intensity of invertebrate leaf damage for most species. A meta-analysis of the relationship between plant traits and response to handling indicated that woody plants and species without strong chemical or conspicuous morphological defenses were most strongly affected. Overall, our results indicate that potentially confounding effects of routinely sampling plants in the field are widespread and merit further investigation.

Key Words: alpine meadow • boreal forest • grassland • meta-analysis • observer effect • old field • thigmomorphogenesis • visitation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. Puijalon and G. Bornette
Phenotypic plasticity and mechanical stress: biomass partitioning and clonal growth of an aquatic plant species
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2006; 93(8): 1090 - 1099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.