HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shaw, A. J. Articles by Boles, S. B. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Shaw, A. J. Articles by Boles, S. B. Agricola Articles by Shaw, A. J. Articles by Boles, S. B.

Polarity of peatmoss (Sphagnum) evolution: who says bryophytes have no roots?¹

Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0338 USA

The class Sphagnopsida (Bryophyta) includes two genera: Ambuchanania and Sphagnum. Ambuchanania contains just one rare species known from two Tasmanian localities, but Sphagnum comprises a speciose clade of mosses that dominates many wetland ecosystems, especially in the boreal zone of the Northern Hemisphere. Recent phylogenetic analyses have resolved well-supported clades within Sphagnum, but polarizing Sphagnum evolution has been problematic because the genus is so isolated that it is difficult to determine homologies between morphological and/or molecular traits within Sphagnum with those of any potential outgroup. DNA sequences from 16 genomic regions representing the mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear genomes (ca. 16 kilobases) were obtained from 24 species of Sphagnum plus one species each from Takakia and Andreaea in order to resolve a rooted phylogeny. Two tropical species, S. sericeum and S. lapazense, were resolved as sister to the rest of the genus and are extremely divergent from all other sphagna. The main Sphagnum lineage consists of two clades; one includes the sections Sphagnum, Rigida, and Cuspidata, and the other includes Subsecunda, Acutifolia, and Squarrosa. The placement of section Subsecunda is weakly supported, but other nodes are strongly supported by maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian analyses. In addition to homogeneous Bayesian analyses, heterogeneous models were employed to account for different patterns of nucleotide substitution among genomic regions.

Key Words: Bayesian inference • bryophytes • peatmoss • phylogenetic reconstruction • Sphagnum

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. J. Shaw, S. Boles, and B. Shaw A phylogenetic delimitation of the "Sphagnum subsecundum complex" (Sphagnaceae, Bryophyta) Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2008; 95(6): 731 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Shaw and C. J. Cox Variation in "biodiversity value" of peatmoss species in Sphagnum section Acutifolia (Sphagnaceae) Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2005; 92(11): 1774 - 1783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-H. Oh and D. Potter Molecular phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of tribe Neillieae (Rosaceae) using DNA sequences of cpDNA, rDNA, and LEAFY Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2005; 92(1): 179 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Shaw and K. Renzaglia Phylogeny and diversification of bryophytes Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2004; 91(10): 1557 - 1581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]