Am. J. Bot. Join BSA Today!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morley, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dick, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Morley, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dick, C. W.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Morley, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dick, C. W.
(American Journal of Botany. 2003;90:1638-1644.)
© 2003 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Systematics and Phytogeography

Missing fossils, molecular clocks, and the origin of the Melastomataceae1

Robert J. Morley2,4 and Christopher W. Dick3

2School of Geography and Environmental Science, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia, and Department of Geology, Royal Holloway University, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK; 3Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Unit 0948, APO AA 34002-0948, USA

In a recent analysis of the historical biogeography of Melastomataceae, Renner, Clausing, and Meyer (2001; American Journal of Botany 88(7): 1290–1300) rejected the hypothesis of a Gondwana origin. Using a fossil-calibrated chloroplast DNA (ndhF) phylogeny, they placed the early diversification of Melastomataceae in Laurasia at the Paleocene/Eocene boundary (ca. 55 Ma) and suggested that long-distance oceanic dispersals in the Oligocene and Miocene (34 to 5 Ma) account for its range expansion into South America, Africa, and Madagascar. Their critical assumption—that oldest northern mid-latitude melastome fossils reflect tribal ages and their geographic origins—may be erroneous, however, because of the sparse fossil record in the tropics. We show that rates of synonymous nucleotide substitutions derived by the Renner et al. (2001) model are up to three times faster than most published rates. Under a Gondwana-origin model advocated here, which includes dispersals from Africa to Southeast Asia via the "Indian ark" and emphasizes filter rather than either sweepstakes dispersal or strict vicariance, rates of nucleotide substitution fall within the range of published rates. We suggest that biogeographic reconstructions need to consider the paucity of Gondwanan fossils and that frequently overlooked interplate dispersal routes provide alternatives to vicariance, boreotropical dispersal, and long-distance oceanic dispersal as explanations for the amphi-oceanic disjunctions of many tropical rain forest plants.

Key Words: chloroplast DNA • Melastomataceae • palynology • plate tectonics • synonymous substitution rates • tropical rain forests




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. J. Sanderson, J. L. Thorne, N. Wikstrom, and K. Bremer
Molecular evidence on plant divergence times
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2004; 91(10): 1656 - 1665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. S. Renner
Bayesian analysis of combined chloroplast loci, using multiple calibrations, supports the recent arrival of Melastomataceae in Africa and Madagascar
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2004; 91(9): 1427 - 1435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.