Am. J. Bot. Li-Cor Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cayenne Engel, E.
Right arrow Articles by Irwin, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cayenne Engel, E.
Right arrow Articles by Irwin, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cayenne Engel, E.
Right arrow Articles by Irwin, R. E.
(American Journal of Botany. 2003;90:1612-1618.)
© 2003 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Reproductive Biology

Linking pollinator visitation rate and pollen receipt1

E. Cayenne Engel2,3,5 and Rebecca E. Irwin2,4,6

2Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, Colorado 81224 USA; 3Department of Biology, Agnes Scott College, Decatur, Georgia 30030 USA; 4Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602 USA

The majority of flowering plants require animals for pollination, a critical ecosystem service in natural and agricultural systems. However, quantifying useful estimates of pollinator visitation rates can be nearly impossible when pollinator visitation is infrequent. We examined the utility of an indirect measure of pollinator visitation, namely pollen receipt by flowers, using the hummingbird-pollinated plant, Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). Our a priori hypothesis was that increased pollinator visitation should result in increased pollen receipt by stigmas. However, the relationship between pollinator visitation rate and pollen receipt may be misleading if pollen receipt is a function of both the number of pollinator visits and variation in pollinator efficiency at depositing pollen, especially in the context of variable floral morphology. Therefore, we measured floral and plant characters known to be important to pollinator visitation and/or pollen receipt in I. aggregata (corolla length and width and plant height) and used path analysis to dissect and compare the effect of pollinator visitation rate vs. pollinator efficiency on pollen receipt. Of the characters we measured, pollinator visitation rate (number of times plants were visited multiplied by the mean percentage of flowers probed per visit) had the strongest direct positive effect on pollen receipt, explaining 36% of the variation in pollen receipt. Plant height had a direct positive effect on pollinator visitation rate and an indirect positive effect on pollen receipt. Despite the supposition that floral characters would directly affect pollen receipt as a result of changes in pollinator efficiency, corolla length and width only weakly affected pollen receipt. These results suggest a direct positive link between pollinator visitation rate and pollen receipt across naturally varying floral morphology in I. aggregata. Understanding the relationship between pollinator visitation rate and pollen receipt may be of critical importance in systems where pollinator visitation is difficult to quantify.

Key Words: floral morphology • hummingbird pollination • Ipomopsis aggregata • path analysis • Polemoniaceae • pollen receipt • pollinator efficiency • pollinator visitation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. O. Brown and J. N. McNeil
Pollination ecology of the high latitude, dioecious cloudberry (Rubus chamaemorus; Rosaceae)
Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2009; 96(6): 1096 - 1107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. Burd, T.-L. Ashman, D. R. Campbell, M. R. Dudash, M. O. Johnston, T. M. Knight, S. J. Mazer, R. J. Mitchell, J. A. Steets, and J. C. Vamosi
Ovule number per flower in a world of unpredictable pollination
Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2009; 96(6): 1159 - 1167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. E. Elliott and R. E. Irwin
Effects of flowering plant density on pollinator visitation, pollen receipt, and seed production in Delphinium barbeyi (Ranunculaceae)
Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2009; 96(5): 912 - 919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. F. Sahli, J. K. Conner, F. H. Shaw, S. Howe, and A. Lale
Adaptive Differentiation of Quantitative Traits in the Globally Distributed Weed, Wild Radish (Raphanus raphanistrum)
Genetics, October 1, 2008; 180(2): 945 - 955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. Alonso
Pollination success across an elevation and sex ratio gradient in gynodioecious Daphne laureola
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2005; 92(8): 1264 - 1269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.