Am. J. Bot.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Preston, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ackerly, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Preston, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ackerly, D. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Preston, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ackerly, D. D.
(American Journal of Botany. 2003;90:1502-1512.)
© 2003 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Ecology

Hydraulic architecture and the evolution of shoot allometry in contrasting climates1

Katherine A. Preston2 and David D. Ackerly

Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5020 USA

We used pairs of congeneric shrub species from contrasting habitats to test for repeated evolutionary divergence in leaf–stem allometry and shoot hydraulic architecture in response to water availability. Allometric relationships and mean ratios between leaf size (individual and total area and mass per shoot) and stem cross-sectional area were compared between habitats using six species pairs representing three genera (Arctostaphylos, Baccharis, Ceanothus). We measured correlations among evolutionary changes in allometric, morphological, and physiological traits using phylogenetic independent contrasts. Allometric analysis revealed habitat differences: slopes were homogeneous among species (=1.46), but the more mesic-adapted species generally supported more leaf area at a common stem cross-sectional area. Reducing bivariate allometry to a ratio obscured this pattern because ratios varied with stem size, which was unrelated to habitat. Mean individual leaf size also was not correlated with either water availability or leaf–stem allometry. Stem hydraulic conductivity was generally lower in the xeric-adapted species of each pair, and its evolution mirrored changes in shoot allometry. This study provides evidence for repeated evolutionary divergence in shoot allometry and hydraulic architecture associated with water availability and demonstrates the importance of shoot allometry to water relations, independent of leaf size.

Key Words: allometry • Huber value • hydraulic conductivity • phylogenetic independent contrasts • species pairs • specific leaf area (SLA)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. J. Willson, P. S. Manos, and R. B. Jackson
Hydraulic traits are influenced by phylogenetic history in the drought-resistant, invasive genus Juniperus (Cupressaceae)
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2008; 95(3): 299 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
P. H. Maseda and R. J. Fernandez
Stay wet or else: three ways in which plants can adjust hydraulically to their environment
J. Exp. Bot., December 1, 2006; 57(15): 3963 - 3977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
S. SUN, D. JIN, and P. SHI
The Leaf Size-Twig Size Spectrum of Temperate Woody Species Along an Altitudinal Gradient: An Invariant Allometric Scaling Relationship
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2006; 97(1): 97 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J.-M. BOUVET, P. VIGNERON, and A. SAYA
Phenotypic Plasticity of Growth Trajectory and Ontogenic Allometry in Response to Density for Eucalyptus Hybrid Clones and Families
Ann. Bot., October 1, 2005; 96(5): 811 - 821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.