Am. J. Bot.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cane, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Schiffhauer, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cane, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Schiffhauer, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cane, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Schiffhauer, D.
(American Journal of Botany. 2003;90:1425-1432.)
© 2003 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Reproductive Biology

Dose-response relationships between pollination and fruiting refine pollinator comparisons for cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon [Ericaceae])1

James H. Cane2,4 and Daniel Schiffhauer3

2USDA-ARS Bee Biology and Systematics Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-5310 USA; 3Ocean Spray Cranberries, Marucci Blueberry/Cranberry Research Center of Rutgers University, P.O. Box 493, Route 563, Chatsworth, New Jersey 08019 USA

Comparisons of pollinator efficacy using pollen received on stigmas can be refined by incorporating experimental dose–response relationships for pollen deposition and fruiting responses. A range of discrete pollen doses applied to cranberry stigmas resulted in decelerating curvilinear responses for fruiting, berry size, and seed set. Minimum thresholds and maximum asymptotes bounded reproductive responses to incremental stigmatic pollen loads. Four bee species were compared for their pollination efficacies on commercial cranberries, using counts of pollen received by stigmas during single bee visits to previously virgin flowers. Differences between these bee species were found to be exaggerated when raw pollen counts were used for comparison because foragers of some species often delivered pollen in excess of that needed to maximize fruit and seed production. Sixfold differences between species in mean pollen deposition translated into 1.5–2-fold differences in predicted cranberry fruit set and size. Implications for pollen tube competition and agricultural production are discussed.

Key Words: Apiformes • bees • Ericaceae • fruit set • pollination efficacy • pollinator • stigmatic load • Vaccinium macrocarpon




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
L. S. ADLER and R. E. IRWIN
Comparison of Pollen Transfer Dynamics by Multiple Floral Visitors: Experiments with Pollen and Fluorescent Dye
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2006; 97(1): 141 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. Alonso
Pollination success across an elevation and sex ratio gradient in gynodioecious Daphne laureola
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2005; 92(8): 1264 - 1269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
C. GONZALEZ, J. F. ORNELAS, and L. JIMENEZ
Between-year Changes in Functional Gender Expression of Palicourea padifolia (Rubiaceae), a Distylous, Hummingbird-pollinated Shrub
Ann. Bot., January 2, 2005; 95(2): 371 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. F. Ornelas, C. Gonzalez, L. Jimenez, C. Lara, and A. J. Martinez
Reproductive ecology of distylous Palicourea padifolia (Rubiaceae) in a tropical montane cloud forest. II. Attracting and rewarding mutualistic and antagonistic visitors
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2004; 91(7): 1061 - 1069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.