Am. J. Bot. Li-Cor Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farjon, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ortiz Garcia, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Farjon, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ortiz Garcia, S.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Farjon, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ortiz Garcia, S.
(American Journal of Botany. 2003;90:8-16.)
© 2003 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Development and Morphogenesis

Cone and ovule development in Cunninghamia and Taiwania (Cupressaceae sensu lato) and its significance for conifer evolution1

Aljos Farjon2,4 and Sol Ortiz Garcia3

2Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AB, UK; 3Instituto de Ecologia, Laboratorio de Genética Molecular y Evolución, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apt. Postal 70-275, México D.F., C.P. 04510, Mexico

We examined the early developmental stages of the seed cones and seeds of two conifer genera, Cunninghamia and Taiwania, using scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of freshly collected material. In recent similar studies, these two taxa were not described. The present paper aims to fill that gap. Both genera appear to have features crucial to the understanding of the evolution of the cupressaceous cone, characteristic of the families Cupressaceae and Taxodiaceae, and provide further evidence for the need to merge these families. These features are: the ovuliferous scale in Cunninghamia develops as a small lobe with each of three ovules; in Taiwania these lobes are absent, but a small ridge could be a vestige of them. In neither of these two genera does an ovuliferous scale develop to maturity and only limited intercalary growth transforms the bracts, of which only their width and final shape distinguishes them from sterile leaves. Thus, the bracts, not the ovuliferous scales, form the mature cone in these two genera. This trend is continued in more derived genera of Cupressaceae. Another key extant taxon that has helped to elucidate the evolution of this type of conifer cone is Sciadopitys; similar studies have already been done on this genus, and we compared our findings to them. We also considered certain fossil Mesozoic conifer cones, which shed further light on the evolution of the cupressaceous cone. The evidence from these various genera strongly indicates that recently reconstructed phylogenies of gymnosperms based on molecular evidence from extant taxa do not reflect the evolution that actually happened. Such studies need to take into account nonmolecular evidence, as detailed here.

Key Words: conifers • Cunninghamia • Cupressaceae • evolution • Mesozoic ovuliferous cones • ontogeny • phylogeny • Sciadopitys • Taiwania • Taxodiaceae






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.