HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sanzol, J. Articles by Herrero, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sanzol, J. Articles by Herrero, M. Agricola Articles by Sanzol, J. Articles by Herrero, M.

Asynchronous development of stigmatic receptivity in the pear (Pyrus communis; Rosaceae) flower¹

²Departamento de Fruticultura, SIA-DGA, Campus de Aula-Dei, P.O. Box 727, 50080 Zaragoza, Spain; ³Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible-CSIC, Alameda del Obispo s/n, P.O. Box 4080, 14080 Córdoba, Spain

While stigma anatomy is well documented for a good number of species, little information is available on the acquisition and cessation of stigmatic receptivity. The aim of this work is to characterize the development of stigma receptivity, from anthesis to stigma degeneration, in the pentacarpellar pear (Pyrus communis) flower. Stigma development and stigmatic receptivity were monitored over two consecutive years, as the capacity of the stigmas to offer support for pollen germination and pollen tube growth. In an experiment where hand pollinations were delayed for specified times after anthesis, three different stigmatic developmental stages could be observed: (1) immature stigmas, which allow pollen adhesion but not hydration; (2) receptive stigmas, which allow proper pollen hydration and germination; and (3) degenerated stigmas, in which pollen hydrates and germinates properly, but pollen tube growth is impaired soon after germination. This developmental characterization showed that stigmas in different developmental stages coexist within a flower and that the acquisition and cessation of stigmatic receptivity by each carpel occur in a sequential manner. In this way, while the duration of stigmatic receptivity for each carpel is rather short, the flower has an expanded receptive period. This asynchronous period of receptivity for the different stigmas of a single flower is discussed as a strategy that could serve to maximize pollination resources under unreliable pollination conditions.

Key Words: pollen germination • Pyrus communis • Rosaceae • stigma • stigmatic receptivity

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Lankinen, W. S. Armbruster, and L. Antonsen Delayed stigma receptivity in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae): genetic variation and adaptive significance in relation to pollen competition, delayed self-pollination, and mating-system evolution Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2007; 94(7): 1183 - 1192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. YI, S. E. LAW, D. MCCOY, and H. Y. WETZSTEIN Stigma Development and Receptivity in Almond (Prunus dulcis) Ann. Bot., January 1, 2006; 97(1): 57 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Sanchez, M. Bosch, M. Bots, J. Nieuwland, R. Feron, and C. Mariani Pistil Factors Controlling Pollination PLANT CELL, June 1, 2004; 16(suppl_1): S98 - S106. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Hedhly, J. I. Hormaza, and M. Herrero Effect of temperature on pollen tube kinetics and dynamics in sweet cherry, Prunus avium (Rosaceae) Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 558 - 564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]