Am. J. Bot.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levin, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sytsma, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Levin, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sytsma, K. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Levin, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sytsma, K. J.
(American Journal of Botany. 2003;90:107-115.)
© 2003 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Systematics

Family-level relationships of Onagraceae based on chloroplast rbcL and ndhF data1

Rachel A. Levin2, Warren L. Wagner2,7, Peter C. Hoch3, Molly Nepokroeff4, J. Chris Pires5, Elizabeth A. Zimmer2 and Kenneth J. Sytsma6

2Department of Systematic Biology, Botany, MRC 166, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 USA; 3Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-0299 USA; 4Department of Biology, 177 Churchill-Haines, University of South Dakota, 414 East Clark St., Vermillion, South Dakota 57069-2390 USA; 5Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1579 USA; 6Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin, 430 Lincoln Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 USA

Despite intensive morphological and molecular studies of Onagraceae, relationships within the family are not fully understood. One drawback of previous analyses is limited sampling within the large tribe Onagreae. In addition, the monophyly of two species-rich genera in Onagreae, Camissonia and Oenothera, has never been adequately tested. To understand relationships within Onagraceae, test the monophyly of these two genera, and ascertain the affinities of the newly discovered genus Megacorax, we conducted parsimony and maximum likelihood analyses with rbcL and ndhF sequence data for 24 taxa representing all 17 Onagraceae genera and two outgroup Lythraceae. Results strongly support a monophyletic Onagraceae, with Ludwigia as the basal lineage and a sister-taxon relationship between Megacorax and Lopezia. Gongylocarpus is supported as sister to Epilobieae plus the rest of Onagreae, although relationships within the latter clade have limited resolution. Thus, we advocate placement of Gongylocarpus in a monogeneric tribe, Gongylocarpeae. Most relationships within Onagreae are weakly resolved, suggesting a rapid diversification of this group in western North America. Neither Camissonia nor Oenothera appears to be monophyletic; however, increased taxon sampling is needed to clarify those relationships. Morphological characters generally agree with the molecular data, providing further support for relationships.

Key Words: CamissoniaMegacoraxndhFOenothera • Onagraceae • Onagreae • phylogeny • rbcL




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Greiner, X. Wang, R. G. Herrmann, U. Rauwolf, K. Mayer, G. Haberer, and J. Meurer
The Complete Nucleotide Sequences of the 5 Genetically Distinct Plastid Genomes of Oenothera, Subsection Oenothera: II. A Microevolutionary View Using Bioinformatics and Formal Genetic Data
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2008; 25(9): 2019 - 2030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. Duangjai, B. Wallnofer, R. Samuel, J. Munzinger, and M. W. Chase
Generic delimitation and relationships in Ebenaceae sensu lato: evidence from six plastid DNA regions
Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2006; 93(12): 1808 - 1827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
W. S. Judd and R. G. Olmstead
A survey of tricolpate (eudicot) phylogenetic relationships
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2004; 91(10): 1627 - 1644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
G. D. Hoggard, P. J. Kores, M. Molvray, and R. K. Hoggard
The phylogeny of Gaura (Onagraceae) based on ITS, ETS, and trnL-F sequence data
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 139 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.