Am. J. Bot. Large Type Edition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lindbladh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lindbladh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, G. L., Jr
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lindbladh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, G. L.
(American Journal of Botany. 2002;89:1459-1467.)
© 2002 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Paleobotany

Morphometric analysis of pollen grains for paleoecological studies: classification of Picea from eastern North America1

Matts Lindbladh2,4, Raymond O'Connor3 and George L. Jacobson Jr2

2Institute for Quaternary and Climate Studies and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469 USA; 3Department of Wildlife Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469 USA

Little is known about the paleoecological histories of the three spruce species (white spruce, Picea glauca; black spruce, P. mariana; and red spruce P. rubens) in eastern North America, largely because of the difficulty of separating the three species in the pollen record. We describe a novel and effective classification method of distinguishing pollen grains on the basis of quantitative analysis of grain attributes. The method is illustrated by an analysis of a large sample of modern pollen grains (522 grains from 38 collections) of the three Picea species, collected from the region where the three species co-occur today. For each species X we computed a binary regression tree that classified each grain either as X or as not-X; these three determinations for each grain were then combined as Hamming codes in an error/uncertainty detection procedure. The use of Hamming codes to link multiple binary trees for error detection allowed identification and exclusion of problematic specimens, with correspondingly greater classification certainty among the remaining grains. We measured 13 attributes of 419 reference grains of the three species to construct the regression trees and classified 103 other reference grains by testing. Species-specific accuracies among the reliably classified grains were 100, 77, and 76% for P. glauca, P. mariana, and P. rubens, respectively, and 21, 30, and 22% of the grains by species, respectively, were problematic. The method is applicable to any multi-species classification problem for which a large reference sample is available.

Key Words: classification and regression-tree (CART) analysis • modern pollen grains • Picea glaucaPicea marianaPicea rubens







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.