Am. J. Bot. Li-Cor Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, R. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, R. K.
(American Journal of Botany. 2002;89:1324-1335.)
© 2002 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Systematics

A chloroplast DNA phylogeny of eastern Phlox (Polemoniaceae): implications of congruence and incongruence with the ITS phylogeny1

Carolyn J. Ferguson2,4 and Robert K. Jansen3

2Herbarium and Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506-4901 USA; 3Section of Integrative Biology, Plant Resources Center, and Institute of Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712 USA

The comparison of independent phylogenies is a valuable approach to the study of evolutionary pattern and process. Available data on eastern North American Phlox, including our recent ITS phylogeny, suggest that relationships are complicated in the group and that hybridization may have been a contributing factor. We used restriction site data from the chloroplast genome to develop a second phylogeny for eastern Phlox. Sampling was the same as that for the ITS study and consisted of 79 samples (including all 22 eastern Phlox species and most eastern subspecies, as well as multiple populations of many taxa). The resulting cpDNA phylogeny agrees with the ITS phylogeny in many respects, strengthening earlier conclusions. Nevertheless, incongruence between the trees is noteworthy: many samples, particularly of members of the P. pilosa and P. glaberrima complexes, are placed in different clades. A variety of tests were carried out to assess congruence in terms of topological patterns, character congruence, and homogeneity of data sets. Significant conflict between the phylogenies is discussed in light of the hypothesis that hybridization has affected relationships in this genus.

Key Words: hybridization • incongruence • introgression • Phlox • phylogeny • Polemoniaceae • restriction site data




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
D. H. Goldman, R. K. Jansen, C. van den Berg, I. J. Leitch, M. F. Fay, and M. W. Chase
Molecular and cytological examination of Calopogon (Orchidaceae, Epidendroideae): circumscription, phylogeny, polyploidy, and possible hybrid speciation
Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2004; 91(5): 707 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
V. Grant
Incongruence between cladistic and taxonomic systems
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2003; 90(9): 1263 - 1270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.