Am. J. Bot. Large Type Edition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doust, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kellogg, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Doust, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kellogg, E. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Doust, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kellogg, E. A.
(American Journal of Botany. 2002;89:1203-1222.)
© 2002 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Development and Morphogenesis

Inflorescence diversification in the panicoid "bristle grass" clade (Paniceae, Poaceae): evidence from molecular phylogenies and developmental morphology1

Andrew N. Doust2 and Elizabeth A. Kellogg

Department of Biology, University of Missouri—St. Louis, 8001 Natural Bridge Road, St. Louis, Missouri 63121 USA

Grasses exhibit a great variety of inflorescence forms and these appear homoplasious when mapped onto cladograms. The overall pattern is sufficiently complex that it is difficult to analyze inflorescence evolution. We have reduced the complexity of the problem by examining one group of grasses, the panicoid "bristle clade," which exhibits a less complex pattern of variation. The clade is morphologically defined by inflorescences bearing both spikelets and sterile bristles and is monophyletic in both morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses. We have constructed a chloroplast DNA phylogeny of the three main genera, which finds three well-supported clades, two comprising species placed in Setaria and one of Pennisetum + Cenchrus. In this tree Cenchrus is monophyletic, but both Setaria and Pennisetum are paraphyletic. Developmental morphology of these groups is very similar at early stages. Changes in axis ramification, primordial differentiation, and axis elongation account for most variation in mature inflorescence morphology. Characters derived from comparisons of developmental sequences were optimized onto one of the most parsimonious trees. Most developmental characters were congruent with the molecular phylogeny except for three reversals in the subclade containing S. barbata, S. palmifolia, and two accessions of S. poiretiana. Changes in just a handful of developmental events account for inflorescence evolution in the bristle clade, and similar changes may account for inflorescence diversity in the grasses as a whole.

Key Words: Cenchrus • development • inflorescence • morphology • Pennisetum • phylogeny • Poaceae • Setaria




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
A. Doust
Architectural Evolution and its Implications for Domestication in Grasses
Ann. Bot., October 1, 2007; 100(5): 941 - 950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
Q. Liu, P. M. Peterson, J. T. Columbus, N. Zhao, G. Hao, and D. Zhang
Inflorescence diversification in the "finger millet clade" (Chloridoideae, Poaceae): a comparison of molecular phylogeny and developmental morphology
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2007; 94(7): 1230 - 1247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
E. A. Kellogg
Progress and challenges in studies of the evolution of development
J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2006; 57(13): 3505 - 3516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
S. Goel, Z. Chen, Y. Akiyama, J. A. Conner, M. Basu, G. Gualtieri, W. W. Hanna, and P. Ozias-Akins
Comparative Physical Mapping of the Apospory-Specific Genomic Region in Two Apomictic Grasses: Pennisetum squamulatum and Cenchrus ciliaris
Genetics, May 1, 2006; 173(1): 389 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. Friedman and L. D. Harder
Functional associations of floret and inflorescence traits among grass species
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2005; 92(11): 1862 - 1870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. N. Doust, K. M. Devos, M. D. Gadberry, M. D. Gale, and E. A. Kellogg
The Genetic Basis for Inflorescence Variation Between Foxtail and Green Millet (Poaceae)
Genetics, March 1, 2005; 169(3): 1659 - 1672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
P. Bommert, N. Satoh-Nagasawa, D. Jackson, and H.-Y. Hirano
Genetics and Evolution of Inflorescence and Flower Development in Grasses
Plant Cell Physiol., January 15, 2005; 46(1): 69 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. N. Doust, K. M. Devos, M. D. Gadberry, M. D. Gale, and E. A. Kellogg
Genetic control of branching in foxtail millet
PNAS, June 15, 2004; 101(24): 9045 - 9050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. N. Doust and A. N. Drinnan
Floral development and molecular phylogeny support the generic status of Tasmannia (Winteraceae)
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2004; 91(3): 321 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
S. Goel, Z. Chen, J. A. Conner, Y. Akiyama, W. W. Hanna, and P. Ozias-Akins
Delineation by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization of a Single Hemizygous Chromosomal Region Associated With Aposporous Embryo Sac Formation in Pennisetum squamulatum and Cenchrus ciliaris
Genetics, March 1, 2003; 163(3): 1069 - 1082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.