HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kawakita, A. Articles by Kato, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kawakita, A. Articles by Kato, M. Agricola Articles by Kawakita, A. Articles by Kato, M.

Floral biology and unique pollination system of root holoparasites, Balanophora kuroiwai and B. tobiracola (Balanophoraceae)¹

²Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan; ³Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Nihonmatsu-cho, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan

We investigated the floral and pollination biology of two monoecious root holoparasites, Balanophora kuroiwai and B. tobiracola (Balanophoraceae), in the subtropical forests of southern Japan. Both species secrete nectar from extrafloral nectaries distributed among the flowers, which is mainly consumed by ants, cockroaches, and pyralid moths. Pollen grains were found attached to the bodies of these insects. Pyralid moths of the genera Assara and Nacoleia were observed laying eggs on the inflorescences of B. kuroiwai. In both Balanophora species, pyralid larvae were found feeding on vegetative tissue without exploiting the seeds, and adults emerged from the fruited infructescences. In B. kuroiwai, we assessed pollination success under different experimental conditions by estimating the percentage of styles that had pollen tubes reaching the ovules. This revealed that: (1) the plants were at least sporophytically self-compatible; (2) they were generally pollinated within an inflorescence (geitonogamy); (3) outcrossing occurred, but the rates varied greatly among inflorescences; and (4) ants were probably responsible for the geitonogamy. While ants and flightless cockroaches were the most likely contributors to geitonogamous self-pollination, we consider pyralid moths to be the most likely cross-pollinators of Balanophora species. This is a new example of pollination mutualism involving a plant and its pollinating parasite.

Key Words: ant • Assara • Balanophora • Balanophoraceae • brood site • mutualism • Nacoleia • pyralid moth

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Suetsugu, A. Kawakita, and M. Kato Host Range and Selectivity of the Hemiparasitic Plant Thesium chinense (Santalaceae) Ann. Bot., July 1, 2008; 102(1): 49 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]