| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Invited Special Paper |
Boyce Thompson Institute, Cornell University, Tower Road, Ithaca, New York 14853 USA
Thigmo mechanisms are adaptations that permit a plant to alter growth rates, change morphology, produce tropisms, avoid barriers, control germination, cling to supporting structures, infect a host plant, facilitate pollination, expedite the movement of pollen, spores, or seeds, and capture prey. Through these varied functions, plant thigmo systems have evolved impressive controls of cell differentiation, localized growth rates, regulated synthesis of novel products, and some elegant traps and projectile systems. For most thigmo events, there will be a dependence upon transmission of a signal from the cell wall through the plasmalemma and into the cytoplasm. We propose the possible involvement of integrin-like proteins, Hechtian strands, and cytoskeletal structures as possible transduction components. Many thigmo mechanisms may use some modification of the calcium/calmodulin signal transduction system, though the details of transduction systems are still poorly understood. While transmission of thigmo signals to remote parts of a plant is associated with the development of action potentials, hormones may also play a role. Thigmo mechanisms have facilitated an enormous array of plant and fungal adaptations that make major contributions to their success despite their relatively sessile or immobile states.
Key Words: mechanosensor • sensing • thigmomorphogenesis • thigmotactic • thigmotropism
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. A. R. Koehl, W. K. Silk, H. Liang, and L. Mahadevan How kelp produce blade shapes suited to different flow regimes: A new wrinkle Integr. Comp. Biol., July 9, 2008; (2008) icn069v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. J. Niklas, H.-C. Spatz, and J. Vincent Plant biomechanics: an overview and prospectus Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1369 - 1378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Schopfer Biomechanics of plant growth Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1415 - 1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. W. Telewski A unified hypothesis of mechanoperception in plants Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1466 - 1476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Puijalon and G. Bornette Phenotypic plasticity and mechanical stress: biomass partitioning and clonal growth of an aquatic plant species Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2006; 93(8): 1090 - 1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. J. Murren and M. Pigliucci Morphological responses to simulated wind in the genus Brassica (Brassicaceae): allopolyploids and their parental species Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2005; 92(5): 810 - 818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Baluska, J. Samaj, P. Wojtaszek, D. Volkmann, and D. Menzel Cytoskeleton-Plasma Membrane-Cell Wall Continuum in Plants. Emerging Links Revisited Plant Physiology, October 1, 2003; 133(2): 482 - 491. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. S. Buer, G. O. Wasteneys, and J. Masle Ethylene Modulates Root-Wave Responses in Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, June 1, 2003; 132(2): 1085 - 1096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. S. Hik, M. Brown, A. Dabros, J. Weir, and J. F. Cahill Jr Prevalence and predictability of handling effects in field studies: results from field experiments and a meta-analysis Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2003; 90(2): 270 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. F. Cahill Jr., J. P. Castelli, and B. B. Casper Separate effects of human visitation and touch on plant growth and herbivory in an old-field community Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2002; 89(9): 1401 - 1409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
