Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jesson, L. K.
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, S. C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jesson, L. K.
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, S. C. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jesson, L. K.
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, S. C. H.
(American Journal of Botany. 2002;89:253-262.)
© 2002 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Reproductive Biology

Enantiostyly in Wachendorfia (Haemodoraceae): the influence of reproductive systems on the maintenance of the polymorphism1

Linley K. Jesson2 and Spencer C. H. Barrett

Department of Botany, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3B2

Enantiostyly is a form of directional asymmetry in plants in which the style is deflected away from the main axis of the flower, either to the left or right side. In Wachendorfia (Haemodoraceae), a small genus of insect-pollinated geophytes restricted to the Cape Province of South Africa, populations are usually polymorphic for asymmetry. Here we investigate dimorphic enantiostyly in the four species of Wachendorfia to determine whether variation in their reproductive systems influences the maintenance of this genetic polymorphism. Experimental field pollinations of W. paniculata and W. thyrsiflora indicated higher fertility for cross- than for self-pollinations, whereas in W. brachyandra, these types of pollination produced similar levels of fertility. Outcrossing rates were highest in W. paniculata (t = 0.78–0.98), with W. brachyandra (t = 0.39–0.79) and W. thyrsiflora (t = 0.76) exhibiting mixed mating systems. Outcrossing rates in two populations of W. parviflora varied from mixed mating (t = 0.61) to predominant selfing (t = 0.07). Population style-morph ratios ranged from 1 : 1 in outcrossing W. paniculata to monomorphism in selfing W. parviflora and clonal W. thyrsiflora. In W. brachyandra, a species with delayed selfing, morph ratios were usually biased. The maintenance of enantiostyly in Wachendorfia appears to be strongly influenced by levels of disassortative mating and the balance between sexual and clonal recruitment.

Key Words: delayed selfing • enantiostyly • experimental pollinations • floral design • Haemodoraceae • outcrossing rates • spatial analysis • style-morph ratios • Wachendorfia




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
R. F. Sage, T. L. Sage, R. W. Pearcy, and T. Borsch
The taxonomic distribution of C4 photosynthesis in Amaranthaceae sensu stricto
Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2007; 94(12): 1992 - 2003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J.-Y. GAO, P.-Y. REN, Z.-H. YANG, and Q.-J. LI
The Pollination Ecology of Paraboea rufescens (Gesneriaceae): a Buzz-pollinated Tropical Herb with Mirror-image Flowers
Ann. Bot., March 1, 2006; 97(3): 371 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. Pauw
Inversostyly: a new stylar polymorphism in an oil-secreting plant, Hemimeris racemosa (Scrophulariaceae)
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2005; 92(11): 1878 - 1886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
L. K. Jesson, J. Kang, S. L. Wagner, S. C. H. Barrett, and N. G. Dengler
The development of enantiostyly
Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2003; 90(2): 183 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.