HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rudall, P. J. Articles by Eastman, A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Rudall, P. J. Articles by Eastman, A. Agricola Articles by Rudall, P. J. Articles by Eastman, A.

Floral anatomy and systematics of Alliaceae with particular reference to Gilliesia, a presumed insect mimic with strongly zygomorphic flowers¹

²Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AB, UK; ³Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK

The floral structure of Alliaceae is assessed in relation to the systematics of the family, especially the nature of the component parts of the remarkably insect-like flower of Gilliesia graminea. Both presence of solid styles and possession of tenuinucellate ovules represent consistent synapomorphies for Alliaceae and support the separation of Agapanthus and Themidaceae from Alliaceae. Within Alliaceae, absence of septal nectaries (i.e., complete fusion of carpel margins) is a synapomorphy for the sister genera Gilliesia and Gethyum; septal nectaries are present in all other Alliaceae. A gynobasic style and reduced ovule number are probable synapomorphies for the genus Allium. In contrast to most other Alliaceae, in Gethyum and Gilliesia only three (abaxial) stamens (A1, a1, a2) are expressed, as in the apostasioid orchid Neuwiedia, but the perianth of Gethyum is only slightly bilaterally symmetric (zygomorphic), whereas Gilliesia graminea shows bilateral symmetry in all three floral whorls: perianth (suppression of the inner adaxial tepal in most flowers), androecium (suppression of three adaxial stamens), and gynoecium (slight bilateral symmetry, evident in transverse section). The precise relationships of Miersia and Solaria, the other two genera of Alliaceae with bilaterally symmetric flowers, are unknown, but their morphology indicates a close relationship with Gilliesia and Gethyum. Appendages of tepaline origin occur in Gethyum, Gilliesia, and Miersia; their papillate epidermis suggests that they function as osmophores. Their presence in Miersia, which has six stamens, indicates that these novel structures, which develop late in floral ontogeny, evolved independently from stamen suppression in this group. Within Gilliesia graminea, the genetic mechanisms controlling tepal number and shape are apparently unstable, resulting in fluctuating asymmetry. In G. graminea the possession of insect mimicry, presence of osmophores and absence of nectar together indicate a deceitful pollination mechanism similar to that of some Orchidaceae; this would make Gilliesia highly unusual among non-orchid monocots, given that pollination by sexual deceit is normally regarded as exclusive to orchids.

Key Words: Alliaceae • Asparagales • CYCLOIDEA • FIDDLEHEAD • flowers • fluctuating asymmetry • Gilliesia • monocotyledons • monosymmetry • pseudocopulation • septal nectary • solid style • transmitting tissue • zygomorphy

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Prenner and P. J. Rudall Comparative ontogeny of the cyathium in Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) and its allies: exploring the organ flower inflorescence boundary Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2007; 94(10): 1612 - 1629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Westerkamp and R. Classen-Bockhoff Bilabiate Flowers: The Ultimate Response to Bees? Ann. Bot., August 1, 2007; 100(2): 361 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Rosa and V. L. Scatena Floral Anatomy of Paepalanthoideae (Eriocaulaceae, Poales) and their Nectariferous Structures Ann. Bot., January 1, 2007; 99(1): 131 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Rudall, W. Stuppy, J. Cunniff, E. A. Kellogg, and B. G. Briggs Evolution of reproductive structures in grasses (Poaceae) inferred by sister-group comparison with their putative closest living relatives, Ecdeiocoleaceae Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2005; 92(9): 1432 - 1443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Ascensao, A. Francisco, H. Cotrim, and M. S. Pais Comparative structure of the labellum in Ophrys fusca and O. lutea (Orchidaceae) Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2005; 92(7): 1059 - 1067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. BLANCO and G. BARBOZA Pseudocopulatory Pollination in Lepanthes (Orchidaceae: Pleurothallidinae) by Fungus Gnats Ann. Bot., April 1, 2005; 95(5): 763 - 772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]