Am. J. Bot. Join BSA Today!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freudenstein, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Rasmussen, F. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Freudenstein, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Rasmussen, F. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Freudenstein, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Rasmussen, F. N.
(American Journal of Botany. 2002;89:1747-1755.)
© 2002 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Structure and Development

The evolution of anther morphology in orchids: incumbent anthers, superposed pollinia, and the vandoid complex1

John V. Freudenstein2,4, Elizabeth M. Harris2 and Finn N. Rasmussen3

2Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, Ohio 43212 USA; 3Botanical Institute, University of Copenhagen, Gothersgade 140, 1123 Copenhagen K, Denmark

The anther is the source of several of the principal characters traditionally used for classification in Orchidaceae, especially in Epidendroideae. In particular, anther and pollinium orientation are important, but little-studied characters; it is not known whether various instances of these states are achieved in the same way. We examined variation in anther and pollinium orientation in Epidendroideae and Vanilloideae using anatomical sections of columns at successive ontogenetic stages and related the observed changes to the final anther morphology to reexamine our homology hypotheses for these characters. Anther bending in vanilloids is achieved primarily by massive expansion of the connective. In nonvandoid epidendroids it is the result of column elongation and tipping of the mature anther, while in vandoids it is due to a redirection of growth in very early ontogenetic stages. Superposed pollinia result from a reorientation of developing thecae; those is Sobralia result from incurving of the thecae, while vandoids have thecae that are directed outward (latrorse). Contrasting ontogenetic and phylogenetic patterns suggest heterochronic changes in these characters, especially in vandoids. These observations allow us to further refine character states that are crucial to our understanding of orchid relationships.

Key Words: anther • column • development • Epidendroideae • Orchidaceae • pollinium







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.