Am. J. Bot. Join BSA Today!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bortiri, E.
Right arrow Articles by Potter, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bortiri, E.
Right arrow Articles by Potter, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bortiri, E.
Right arrow Articles by Potter, D.
(American Journal of Botany. 2002;89:1697-1708.)
© 2002 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Systematics and Phytogeography

The phylogenetic utility of nucleotide sequences of sorbitol 6-phosphate dehydrogenase in Prunus (Rosaceae)1

Esteban Bortiri2, Sang-Hun Oh, Fang-You Gao and Dan Potter

University of California—Davis, Department of Pomology, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616 USA

Sequences from s6pdh, a gene that encodes sorbitol-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in the Rosaceae, are used to reconstruct the phylogeny of 22 species of Prunus. The s6pdh sequences alone and in combination with previously published sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the cpDNA trnL-trnF spacer are analyzed using parsimony and maximum likelihood methods. Both methods reconstructed the same phylogeny when s6pdh sequences are used alone and in combination with ITS and trnL-trnF, and the topology is in agreement with previous studies that used a larger sample size. The s6pdh sequences have about twice as many informative sites as ITS. A molecular clock is rejected for s6pdh, most likely due to greater rates of evolution in subgenera Padus and Laurocerasus than in the rest of the genus. Phylogenetic reconstruction of Prunus as determined by analysis of the combined data set suggests an early split into two clades. One is composed of subgenera Cerasus, Laurocerasus, and Padus. The second includes subgenera Amygdalus, Emplectocladus, and Prunus. Species of section Microcerasus (formerly in subgenus Cerasus) are nested within subgenus Prunus. The order of branching and relationships among early diverging lineages is weakly supported, as a result of very short branches that may indicate rapid radiation.

Key Words: alcohol dehydrogenase • likelihood • molecular clock • parsimony • Prunuss6pdh




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. Shaw and R. L. Small
Addressing the "hardest puzzle in American pomology:" Phylogeny of Prunus sect. Prunocerasus (Rosaceae) based on seven noncoding chloroplast DNA regions
Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2004; 91(6): 985 - 996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
V. C. Muschner, A. P. Lorenz, A. C. Cervi, S. L. Bonatto, T. T. Souza-Chies, F. M. Salzano, and L. B. Freitas
A first molecular phylogenetic analysis of Passiflora (Passifloraceae)
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2003; 90(8): 1229 - 1238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.