Am. J. Bot.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Eissenstat, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Eissenstat, D. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wells, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Eissenstat, D. M.
(American Journal of Botany. 2002;89:79-87.)
© 2002 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Ecology

Changes in the risk of fine-root mortality with age: a case study in peach, Prunus persica (Rosaceae)1

Christina E. Wells2,5, D. Michael Glenn3 and David M. Eissenstat2,4,6

2Intercollege Graduate Program in Plant Physiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 USA; 3USDA-ARS Appalachian Fruit Research Station, Kearneysville, West Virginia 25430 USA; and 4Department of Horticulture, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 USA

Previous studies suggest that younger roots are more vulnerable to mortality than older roots. We analyzed minirhizotron data using a mixed-age, proportional hazards regression approach to determine whether the risk of mortality (or "hazard") was higher for younger roots than for older roots in a West Virginia peach orchard. While root age apparently had a strong effect on the hazard when considered alone, this effect was largely due to different rates of mortality among roots of different orders, diameters, and depths. Roots with dependent laterals (higher order roots) had a lower hazard than first-order roots in 1996 and 1997. Greater root diameter was also associated with a decreased hazard in both 1996 and 1997. In both years, there was a significant decrease in the hazard with depth. When considered alone, age appeared to be a strong predictor of risk: a 1-d increase in initial root age was associated with a 1.26–2.62% decrease in the hazard. However, when diameter, order, and depth were incorporated into the model, the effect of root age disappeared or was greatly reduced. Baseline hazard function plots revealed that the timing of high-risk periods was generally related to seasonal factors rather than individual root age.

Key Words: minirhizotron • peach • Prunus persica • root age • root demography • root mortality • Rosaceae




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
A. E. Strand, S. G. Pritchard, M. L. McCormack, M. A. Davis, and R. Oren
Irreconcilable Differences: Fine-Root Life Spans and Soil Carbon Persistence
Science, January 25, 2008; 319(5862): 456 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
X. Huang, A. N. Lakso, and D. M. Eissenstat
Interactive effects of soil temperature and moisture on Concord grape root respiration
J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2005; 56(420): 2651 - 2660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.