Am. J. Bot.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rocha, O. J.
Right arrow Articles by Aguilar, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rocha, O. J.
Right arrow Articles by Aguilar, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rocha, O. J.
Right arrow Articles by Aguilar, G.
(American Journal of Botany. 2001;88:1607-1614.)
© 2001 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Reproductive Biology

Reproductive biology of the dry forest tree Enterolobium cyclocarpum (guanacaste) in Costa Rica: a comparison between trees left in pastures and trees in continuous forest1

Oscar J. Rocha2 and Gabriel Aguilar

Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, Ciudad Universitaria "Rodrigo Facio," San Pedro de Montes de Oca, San José, Costa Rica

ABSTRACT

We compared the rate of pollen deposition, the likelihood of fruit production, the number of seeds per fruit, the outcrossing rate, and the progeny vigor of the tropical dry forest tree Enterolobium cyclocarpum for individuals in pastures vs. individuals in continuous forest. We found that flowers from trees growing in continuous forests were more likely to have pollen deposited on their stigmas than flowers from trees in pastures (52.1 vs. 32.3%, respectively). We also found that trees from continuous forests were almost six times more likely to set fruits and produce more seeds per fruit than trees in pastures. Morever, progeny from trees in continuous forests were, on average, more vigorous than the progeny from trees in pastures, as indicated by 12 of 16 indicators of plant vigor. However, there was no significant difference in the multilocus estimate of the outcrossing rate between the two groups of trees (tm = 1.00 and 0.99 for trees from continuous forest and trees from pastures, respectively). But there are differences in the correlation of paternity between the progeny of the two groups, where the progeny from trees in pastures showed a lower correlation of paternity than progeny of trees from continuous forests (rp = 0.104 and rp = 0.189, respectively). We argue that the mechanisms that regulate progeny vigor are disrupted in trees from pastures. We discuss the implications of these findings for the conservation of E. cyclocarpum.

Key Words: correlated mating • fruit abortion • mixed mating • outcrossing rate • pollen deposition • polyads • seed abortion




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
E. A. Pardini and J. L. Hamrick
Hierarchical patterns of paternity within crowns of Albizia julibrissin (Fabaceae)
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2007; 94(1): 111 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. Dutech, V. L. Sork, A. J. Irwin, P. E. Smouse, and F. W. Davis
Gene flow and fine-scale genetic structure in a wind-pollinated tree species, Quercus lobata (Fagaceaee)
Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2005; 92(2): 252 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
V. L. Sork, P. E. Smouse, V. J. Apsit, R. J. Dyer, and R. D. Westfall
A two-generation analysis of pollen pool genetic structure in flowering dogwood, Cornus florida (Cornaceae), in the Missouri Ozarks
Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2005; 92(2): 262 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.