Am. J. Bot. Large Type Edition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rice, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rice, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, A. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rice, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, A. M.
(American Journal of Botany. 2001;88:1568-1576.)
© 2001 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Physiology and Development

Functional significance of variation in bryophyte canopy structure1

Steven K. Rice2,4, David Collins2 and Ann M. Anderson3

2Department of Biological Sciences, Union College, Schenectady, New York 12308 USA 3Department of Mechanical Engineering, Union College, Schenectady, New York 12308 USA

In most bryophytes, the thickness of boundary layers (i.e., unstirred layers) that surrounds plant surfaces governs rates of water loss. Architectural features of canopies that influence boundary layer thickness affect the water balance of bryophytes. Using field samples (9.3 cm diameter cushions) from 12 populations (11 species) of mosses and liverworts, we evaluated the relationship between canopy structure and boundary layer properties. Canopy structure was characterized using a contact surface probe to measure canopy depth along perpendicular transects at spatial scales ranging from 0.8 to 30 mm on 186 points per sample. Semivariance in depth measurements at different spatial scales was used to estimate three architectural properties: surface roughness (Lr), the scale of roughness elements (Sr), and fine-scale surface texture, the latter characterized by the fractal dimension (D) of the canopy profile. Boundary layer properties were assessed by evaporation of ethanol from samples in a wind-tunnel at wind speeds from 0.6 to 4.2 m/s and applied to characterize mass transfer using principles of dynamic similarity (i.e., using dimensionless representations of conductance and flow). In addition, particle image velocimetry (PIV) was used to visualize and quantify flow over two species. All cushions exhibited the characteristics of turbulent as opposed to laminar boundary layers, and conductance increased with surface roughness. Bryophyte canopies with higher Lr had greater conductances at all wind speeds. Particle image velocimetry analysis verified that roughness elements interacted with flow and caused turbulent eddies to enter canopies, enhancing evaporation. All three morphological features were significantly associated with evaporation. When Lr, Sr, and D were incorporated with a flow parameter into a conductance model using multiple linear regression, the model accounted for 91% of the variation in mass transfer.

Key Words: boundary layer • bryophyte • evaporation • fractal dimension • growth form • particle image velocimetry (PIV) • surface roughness




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
M. J. Oliver, J. Velten, and B. D. Mishler
Desiccation Tolerance in Bryophytes: A Reflection of the Primitive Strategy for Plant Survival in Dehydrating Habitats?
Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2005; 45(5): 788 - 799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. K. Rice and N. Schneider
Cushion size, surface roughness, and the control of water balance and carbon flux in the cushion moss Leucobryum glaucum (Leucobryaceae)
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2004; 91(8): 1164 - 1172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
L. R. Stark, L. Nichols II, D. N. McLetchie, S. D. Smith, and C. Zundel
Age and sex-specific rates of leaf regeneration in the Mojave Desert moss Syntrichia caninervis
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 1 - 9.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.