Am. J. Bot. Li-Cor Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Niklas, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Speck, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Niklas, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Speck, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Niklas, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Speck, T.
(American Journal of Botany. 2001;88:1266-1278.)
© 2001 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Ecology

Evolutionary trends in safety factors against wind-induced stem failure1

Karl J. Niklas2,4 and Thomas Speck3

2Department of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-5853 USA 3Botanischer Garten der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg i. Br., D-79104 Germany

We explore the hypothesis that the safety factor against wind-induced stem failure remained high during early land plant evolution despite an evolutionary increase in height with concomitant increases in wind-induced drag forces, bending stresses, and moments. This hypothesis was examined for 17 Paleozoic plant species assuming that each (1) existed in a densely packed community of conspecifics with equivalent height, (2) coped with the same wind profile (where ambient wind speed decreased toward ground level), but (3) had different within-canopy wind speeds depending on plant height and general morphology. Drag forces, stresses, and moments were computed, and a safety factor was calculated for each taxon using the quotient of its stem-tissue breaking stress and maximum wind-induced bending stress.

The highest factors of safety were calculated among the most ancient rhyniophyte and zosterophyllophyte species examined (e.g., Rhynia and Gosslingia), and, on average, decreased among the taller and geologically younger species. The tallest species examined (e.g., Archaeopteris and Diaphorodendron) had safety factors equal to or higher than those of some of their presumed ancestors (e.g., Psilophyton and Leclercqia). These trends were statistically more robust among rhyniophytes and their presumed descendants.

Even though the results comply with the hypothesis, numerous limitations of our protocol exist (e.g., the requirement for reliable whole-plant reconstructions). These are discussed in terms of our theory. Nonetheless, we believe our theory and protocol afford a reasonable opportunity to explore the effects of wind on early plant evolution.

Key Words: biomechanics • factors of safety • fossil plants • mechanical stability • wind-loading




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
Q. Wang, B.-Y. Geng, and D. L. Dilcher
New perspective on the architecture of the Late Devonian arborescent lycopsid Leptophloeum rhombicum (Leptophloeaceae)
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2005; 92(1): 83 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. Reich, N. M. Holbrook, and J. J. Ewel
Developmental and physiological correlates of leaf size in Hyeronima alchorneoides (Euphorbiaceae)
Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 582 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
O. Speck
Field measurements of wind speed and reconfiguration in Arundo donax (Poaceae) with estimates of drag forces
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2003; 90(8): 1253 - 1256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.