HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

What's this?

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Niklas, K. J. Articles by Speck, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Niklas, K. J. Articles by Speck, T. Agricola Articles by Niklas, K. J. Articles by Speck, T. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Evolutionary trends in safety factors against wind-induced stem failure¹

²Department of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-5853 USA ³Botanischer Garten der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg i. Br., D-79104 Germany

We explore the hypothesis that the safety factor against wind-induced stem failure remained high during early land plant evolution despite an evolutionary increase in height with concomitant increases in wind-induced drag forces, bending stresses, and moments. This hypothesis was examined for 17 Paleozoic plant species assuming that each (1) existed in a densely packed community of conspecifics with equivalent height, (2) coped with the same wind profile (where ambient wind speed decreased toward ground level), but (3) had different within-canopy wind speeds depending on plant height and general morphology. Drag forces, stresses, and moments were computed, and a safety factor was calculated for each taxon using the quotient of its stem-tissue breaking stress and maximum wind-induced bending stress.

The highest factors of safety were calculated among the most ancient rhyniophyte and zosterophyllophyte species examined (e.g., Rhynia and Gosslingia), and, on average, decreased among the taller and geologically younger species. The tallest species examined (e.g., Archaeopteris and Diaphorodendron) had safety factors equal to or higher than those of some of their presumed ancestors (e.g., Psilophyton and Leclercqia). These trends were statistically more robust among rhyniophytes and their presumed descendants.

Even though the results comply with the hypothesis, numerous limitations of our protocol exist (e.g., the requirement for reliable whole-plant reconstructions). These are discussed in terms of our theory. Nonetheless, we believe our theory and protocol afford a reasonable opportunity to explore the effects of wind on early plant evolution.

Key Words: biomechanics • factors of safety • fossil plants • mechanical stability • wind-loading

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Q. Wang, B.-Y. Geng, and D. L. Dilcher New perspective on the architecture of the Late Devonian arborescent lycopsid Leptophloeum rhombicum (Leptophloeaceae) Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2005; 92(1): 83 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Reich, N. M. Holbrook, and J. J. Ewel Developmental and physiological correlates of leaf size in Hyeronima alchorneoides (Euphorbiaceae) Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 582 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Speck Field measurements of wind speed and reconfiguration in Arundo donax (Poaceae) with estimates of drag forces Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2003; 90(8): 1253 - 1256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]