Am. J. Bot. Large Type Edition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaughton, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ramsey, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vaughton, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ramsey, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Vaughton, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ramsey, M.
(American Journal of Botany. 2001;88:1223-1229.)
© 2001 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Population Biology

Variation in summer dormancy in the lilioid geophyte Burchardia umbellata (Colchicaceae)1

Glenda Vaughton2 and Mike Ramsey3,4

2Botany, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia; 3Division of Botany and Zoology, The Australian National University, ACT 0200, Australia

Plant dormancy is a form of phenotypic plasticity that minimizes exposure to seasonally stressful conditions. We examined variation in summer dormancy in two highland and two lowland populations of the lilioid geophyte Burchardia umbellata to test the prediction that facultative dormancy is advantageous in habitats with variable summer conditions. Consistent with this prediction fewer highland plants than lowland plants became dormant under wet common garden conditions. Also, significant among-family variance occurred within highland but not lowland populations, indicating genetic differences among and within populations. Most lowland plants became dormant when exposed to wet or dry conditions (~92%), indicating that dormancy was primarily obligate. In contrast, dormancy in highland plants increased from 44% under wet conditions to 93% under dry conditions, indicating that dormancy of some highland plants was facultative and induced by drought. Survival, growth, and flowering were reduced in lowland populations, and in dormant vs. nondormant highland plants, indicating costs of dormancy that could negate the advantages of dormancy under variable summer conditions. Summers in lowland populations are predictably hot and dry, favoring a phenotype that responds invariably to environmental cues that are correlated to future dry conditions. In highland populations, variable summer conditions probably maintain polymorphism in dormancy.

Key Words: Burchardia umbellata • Colchicaceae • environmental cues • geophyte • habitat-specific selection • phenotypic plasticity; • plant dormancy • threshold trait




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
F. VOLAIRE and M. NORTON
Summer Dormancy in Perennial Temperate Grasses
Ann. Bot., November 1, 2006; 98(5): 927 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. OFIR and J. KIGEL
Variation in Onset of Summer Dormancy and Flowering Capacity Along an Aridity Gradient in Poa bulbosa L., a Geophytic Perennial Grass
Ann. Bot., February 1, 2003; 91(3): 391 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.