HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Meloche, C. G. Articles by Diggle, P. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Meloche, C. G. Articles by Diggle, P. K. Agricola Articles by Meloche, C. G. Articles by Diggle, P. K.

Preformation, architectural complexity, and developmental flexibility in Acomastylis rossii (Rosaceae)¹

Department of Environmental, Population, and Organismic Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0334 USA

The duration of preformation and the seasonal pattern of development were studied in the architecturally complex alpine perennial Acomastylis rossii. Each leaf and inflorescence requires 3 yr to progress from initiation through structural and functional maturity to senescence. As a consequence, three cohorts of preformed organs, initiated in successive years, are borne simultaneously by each individual plant. The oldest cohort matures immediately following snowmelt, after which no additional leaves are matured until the following spring. A second cohort remains below ground in the apical bud and continues development, while a third cohort is initiated. Initiation and development of primordia proceed below ground throughout the summer and continue for at least 2.5 mo after aboveground structures have senesced. Acomastylis rossii maintains numerous dormant vegetative buds containing preformed leaf primordia in the axils of senesced leaves. Developmental preformation has been widely reported in arctic and alpine tundra environments and has been theorized to severely constrain rapid responses to environmental variation. The presence of many such preformed structures may mitigate some of the constraint on plant response to environmental variation imposed by the long developmental trajectories of leaves and inflorescences in apical buds.

Key Words: Acomastylis rossii • allocation • alpine • bud dormancy • development • phenotypic plasticity • preformation • Rosaceae

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Barthelemy and Y. Caraglio Plant Architecture: A Dynamic, Multilevel and Comprehensive Approach to Plant Form, Structure and Ontogeny Ann. Bot., March 1, 2007; 99(3): 375 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. PALACIO and G. MONTSERRAT-MARTI Bud Morphology and Shoot Growth Dynamics in Two Species of Mediterranean Sub-shrubs Co-Existing in Gypsum Outcrops Ann. Bot., May 1, 2005; 95(6): 949 - 958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. G. Meloche and P. K. Diggle The pattern of carbon allocation supporting growth of preformed shoot primordia in Acomastylis rossii (Rosaceae) Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2003; 90(9): 1313 - 1320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]