Am. J. Bot. Join BSA Today!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Totland, O.
Right arrow Articles by Sottocornola, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Totland, O.
Right arrow Articles by Sottocornola, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Totland, O.
Right arrow Articles by Sottocornola, M.
(American Journal of Botany. 2001;88:1011-1015.)
© 2001 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Reproductive Biology

Pollen limitation of reproductive success in two sympatric alpine willows (Salicaceae) with contrasting pollination strategies1

Ørjan Totland2,4 and Matteo Sottocornola3

2Department of Biology and Nature Conservation, The Agricultural University of Norway, P.O. Box 5014, N-1432 Ås, Norway 3via Gallicciolli 2, 24121 Bergamo, Italy

We compared the extent of pollen limitation on female reproductive success of Salix lanata L., an entirely insect-pollinated willow, and S. lapponum L., which is 50 : 50% insect : wind pollinated (ambophilous). Supplemental hand-pollination significantly increased seed number per fruit by nearly 50% in the insect-pollinated willow, but had no significant impact on seed number in the dually pollinated species. Fruit set was not affected by the treatment in either of the species. These results demonstrate that pollen limitation on reproductive success is most pronounced in the species that depends entirely on insects for pollination. In general, pollinator visitation was highest to S. lapponum, but bumble bees were only observed on S. lanata, suggesting that the quantity and quality of pollinator visitation differed between the species. Our results empirically support the hypothesis that a dual pollination strategy is most effective in alpine environments with low and infrequent pollinator activity and high wind speeds.

Key Words: alpine • natural selection • pollen limitation • reproductive assurance • resource depletion • Salix • wind pollination




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
Z.-Q. Zhang and Q.-J. Li
Autonomous Selfing Provides Reproductive Assurance in an Alpine Ginger Roscoea schneideriana (Zingiberaceae)
Ann. Bot., August 5, 2008; (2008) mcn136v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.