HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (27) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Johnston, J. A. Articles by Arnold, M. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Johnston, J. A. Articles by Arnold, M. L. Agricola Articles by Johnston, J. A. Articles by Arnold, M. L.

Environment-dependent performance and fitness of Iris brevicaulis, I. fulva (Iridaceae), and hybrids¹

²Department of Botany, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602 USA; and ³Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602 USA

We tested the relative fitness of two Louisiana Iris species (Iris brevicaulis and I. fulva) and their first-generation backcross hybrids in three experimental watering treatments: dry, field capacity, and flooded. Leaf area expansion rate, gas exchange (A_max, g_s, c_i), and biomass at final harvest were measured for each species and hybrid class in all three environmental treatments. Fitness (based on total biomass) of the four genotypic classes differed significantly with environment. All genotypic classes performed most poorly in the dry treatment. The fitness ranking of genotypic class also changed across environments (significant genotypic class by treatment interaction) with hybrid genotype fitness shifting relative to parental genotypes. Integrating over all treatments, backcrosses to I. fulva showed the lowest fitness, whereas backcrosses to I. brevicaulis outperformed I. fulva. The differences in fitness were apparently achieved by a combination of differences in photosynthesis and allocation. In this system, hybrids are not necessarily less fit than their parents, and the relationship between hybrid and parental fitness is influenced by environmental conditions, lending support to the Hybrid Novelty model of hybrid zone evolution.

Key Words: environment-dependent selection • hybrid fitness • hybrid novelty • hybrid zone • Louisiana Iris • photosynthesis

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. A. Tierney and G. M. Wardle The relative fitness of parental and hybrid Kunzea (Myrtaceae): The interaction of reproductive traits and ecological selection Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2008; 95(2): 146 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Wu and D. R. Campbell Leaf physiology reflects environmental differences and cytoplasmic background in Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) hybrids Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2007; 94(11): 1804 - 1812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Bouck, R. Peeler, M. L. Arnold, and S. R. Wessler Genetic Mapping of Species Boundaries in Louisiana Irises Using IRRE Retrotransposon Display Markers Genetics, November 1, 2005; 171(3): 1289 - 1303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Kirk, K. Vrieling, and P. G. L. Klinkhamer Reproductive fitness of hybrids between Senecio jacobaea and S. aquaticus (Asteraceae) Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2005; 92(9): 1467 - 1473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Murren and M. Pigliucci Morphological responses to simulated wind in the genus Brassica (Brassicaceae): allopolyploids and their parental species Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2005; 92(5): 810 - 818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. S. Burgess and B. C. Husband Maternal and paternal contributions to the fitness of hybrids between red and white mulberry (Morus, Moraceae) Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2004; 91(11): 1802 - 1808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]