|
|
||||||||
2Institut für Spezielle Botanik, Universität Mainz, D-55099 Mainz, Germany; 3Department of Biology, University of Missouri-St. Louis, 8001 Natural Bridge Rd., St. Louis, Missouri 63121 USA; and The Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri 63166 USA
Melastomataceae are among the most abundant and diversified groups of plants throughout the tropics, but their intrafamily relationships and morphological evolution are poorly understood. Here we report the results of parsimony and maximum likelihood (ML) analyses of cpDNA sequences from the rbcL and ndhF genes and the rpl16 intron, generated for eight outgroups (Crypteroniaceae, Alzateaceae, Rhynchocalycaceae, Oliniaceae, Penaeaceae, Myrtaceae, and Onagraceae) and 54 species of melastomes. The sample represents 42 of the family's currently recognized
150 genera, the 13 traditional tribes, and the three subfamilies, Astronioideae, Melastomatoideae, and Memecyloideae (= Memecylaceae DC.). Parsimony and ML yield congruent topologies that place Memecylaceae as sister to Melastomataceae. Pternandra, a Southeast Asian genus of 15 species of which five were sampled, is the first- branching Melastomataceae. This placement has low bootstrap support (72%), but agrees with morphological treatments that placed Pternandra in Melastomatacaeae because of its acrodromal leaf venation, usually ranked as a tribe or subfamily. The interxylary phloem islands found in Memecylaceae and Pternandra, but not most other Melastomataceae, likely evolved in parallel because Pternandra resembles Melastomataceae in its other wood characters. A newly discovered plesiomorphic character in Pternandra, also present in Memecylaceae, is a fibrous anther endothecium. Higher Melastomataceae lack an endothecium as do the closest relatives of Melastomataceae and Memecylaceae. The next deepest split is between Astronieae, with anthers opening by slits, and all remaining Melastomataceae, which have anthers opening by pores. Within the latter, several generic groups, corresponding to traditional tribes, receive solid statistical support, but relationships among them, with one exception, are different from anything predicted on the basis of morphological data. Thus, Miconieae and Merianieae are sister groups, and both are sister to a trichotomy of Bertolonieae, Microlicieae + Melastomeae, and Dissochaeteae + Blakeeae. Sonerileae/Oxysporeae are nested within Dissochaeteae, Rhexieae within Melastomeae, and African and Asian Melastomeae within neotropical Melastomeae. These findings have profound implications for our understanding of melastome morphological evolution (and biogeography), implying, for example, that berries evolved from capsules minimally four times, stamen connectives went from dorsally enlarged to basal/ventrally enlarged, and loss of an endothecium preceded poricidal dehiscence.
Key Words: endothecium Melastomataceae Memecylaceae Myrtales ndhF phylogeny rbcL rpl16
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. ABE Threatened Pollination Systems in Native Flora of the Ogasawara (Bonin) Islands Ann. Bot., August 1, 2006; 98(2): 317 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Lohne and T. Borsch Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetic Utility of the petD Group II Intron: A Case Study in Basal Angiosperms Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2005; 22(2): 317 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Renner Bayesian analysis of combined chloroplast loci, using multiple calibrations, supports the recent arrival of Melastomataceae in Africa and Madagascar Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2004; 91(9): 1427 - 1435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. Judd and R. G. Olmstead A survey of tricolpate (eudicot) phylogenetic relationships Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2004; 91(10): 1627 - 1644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Fritsch, F. Almeda, S. S. Renner, A. B. Martins, and B. C. Cruz Phylogeny and circumscription of the near-endemic Brazilian tribe Microlicieae (Melastomataceae) Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2004; 91(7): 1105 - 1114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Schonenberger and E. Conti Molecular phylogeny and floral evolution of Penaeaceae, Oliniaceae, Rhynchocalycaceae, and Alzateaceae (Myrtales) Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2003; 90(2): 293 - 309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Hall, K. J. Sytsma, and H. H. Iltis Phylogeny of Capparaceae and Brassicaceae based on chloroplast sequence data Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2002; 89(11): 1826 - 1842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Kelchner Group II introns as phylogenetic tools: structure, function, and evolutionary constraints Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2002; 89(10): 1651 - 1669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. JANSEN, T. WATANABE, and E. SMETS Aluminium Accumulation in Leaves of 127 Species in Melastomataceae, with Comments on the Order Myrtales Ann. Bot., July 1, 2002; 90(1): 53 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Renner, G. Clausing, and K. Meyer Historical biogeography of Melastomataceae: the roles of Tertiary migration and long-distance dispersal Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2001; 88(7): 1290 - 1300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |