|
|
||||||||
2Division of Biological Sciences, 105 Tucker Hall, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211 USA; and 3Department of Forestry, 203 ABNR Bldg, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211 USA
In a controlled environment, we artificially induced drought during flowering of Epilobium angustifolium, an animal-pollinated plant. Leaf water potential (
l) and floral traits were monitored over a 12-d period of soil moisture depletion. Soil moisture depletion induced drought stress over time, as revealed by significant treatment x day interactions for predawn and midday
l. Nectar volume and flower size showed significant negative responses to drought stress, but nectar sugar concentration did not vary between treatments. Floral traits were more buffered from drought than leaf water potentials. We used path analysis to examine direct and indirect effects of
l on floral traits for plants in well-watered (control) vs. drought treatments. According to the best-fit path models, midday
l has significant positive effects on flower size and nectar volume in both environments. However, for controls midday
l also had a significant negative effect on nectar sugar concentration. Results indicate that traits influencing floral attractiveness to pollinators in E. angustifolium vary with plant water status, such that pollinator-mediated selection could indirectly target physiological or biochemical controls on
l. Moreover, under mesic conditions selection for greater nectar sugar reward may be constrained by the antagonistic effects of plant water status on nectar volume and sugar concentration.
Key Words: drought stress Epilobium angustifolium flower size leaf water potential nectar production nectar sugar concentration Onagraceae phenotypic plasticity pollinator-mediated selection
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
U. Effmert, C. Dinse, and B. Piechulla Influence of Green Leaf Herbivory by Manduca sexta on Floral Volatile Emission by Nicotiana suaveolens Plant Physiology, April 1, 2008; 146(4): 1996 - 2007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Fenster, G. Cheely, M. R. Dudash, and R. J. Reynolds Nectar reward and advertisement in hummingbird-pollinated Silene virginica (Caryophyllaceae) Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2006; 93(12): 1800 - 1807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. ACKERMANN and M. WEIGEND Nectar, Floral Morphology and Pollination Syndrome in Loasaceae subfam. Loasoideae (Cornales) Ann. Bot., September 1, 2006; 98(3): 503 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Caruso Plasticity of inflorescence traits in Lobelia siphilitica (Lobeliaceae) in response to soil water availability Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2006; 93(4): 531 - 538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. HERRERA Flower Size Variation in Rosmarinus officinalis: Individuals, Populations and Habitats Ann. Bot., February 1, 2005; 95(3): 431 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Caruso, S. B. Peterson, and C. E. Ridley Natural selection on floral traits of Lobelia (Lobeliaceae): spatial and temporal variation Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2003; 90(9): 1333 - 1340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |