Am. J. Bot.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olfelt, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Luby, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olfelt, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Luby, J. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Olfelt, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Luby, J. J.
(American Journal of Botany. 2001;88:401-410.)
© 2001 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

What data determine whether a plant taxon is distinct enough to merit legal protection? A case study of Sedum integrifolium (Crassulaceae)1

Joel P. Olfelt 2, 5, Glenn R. Furnier 3 and James J. Luby 4

2Department of Biology, St. Olaf College, 1520 St. Olaf Avenue, Northfield, Minnesota 55057-1098 USA; 3Hohokum Middle School, 7400 Settler Avenue, Tuscon, Arizona 85746 USA; and 4Department of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota, 1970 Folwell Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 USA

Measures of molecular and morphological genetic variation are often used to set conservation priorities and design management strategies for plant taxa. Evaluated together they can give insights into a taxon's evolutionary status that neither data type alone can achieve. We investigated the distinctness and variability of Sedum integrifolium ssp. leedyi, a federally and state-listed taxon, from its conspecific relatives using 33 random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers (253 plants) and 37 morphological characters from 1308 common-garden-grown plants. We included S. integrifolium ssp. leedyi (four populations), its conspecific relatives (11 populations), and S. rosea and S. rhodanthum populations in our study. The morphological and molecular data correspond in showing that S. integrifolium ssp. leedyi populations are highly distinct. However, the data sets differ in their estimates of the relatedness of some S. integrifolium ssp. leedyi populations and in the percentage variation detected due to differences among them (25 and 9–13% for the molecular and morphological data, respectively) suggesting little gene flow among populations and some differentiation, possibly from selective pressures. Given our data, we recommend that S. integrifolium ssp. leedyi merits protection under the U.S. Endangered Species Act and that its populations be managed as distinct units.

Key Words: common garden • conservation biology • Crassulaceae • genetic variation • Sedum integrifolium ssp. leedyi • RAPDs • rare plant




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
G. Mameli, R. Filigheddu, G. Binelli, and M. Meloni
The Genetic Structure of the Remnant Populations of Centaurea horrida in Sardinia and Associated Islands
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(5): 633 - 640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. L. Jorgensen, I. Stehlik, C. Brochmann, and E. Conti
Implications of ITS sequences and RAPD markers for the taxonomy and biogeography of the Oxytropis campestris and O. arctica (Fabaceae) complexes in Alaska
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2003; 90(10): 1470 - 1480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. T. Tercek, D. P. Hauber, and S. P. Darwin
Genetic and historical relationships among geothermally adapted Agrostis (bentgrass) of North America and Kamchatka: evidence for a previously unrecognized, thermally adapted taxon
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2003; 90(9): 1306 - 1312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.