Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (50)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montalvo, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ellstrand, N. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Montalvo, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ellstrand, N. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Montalvo, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ellstrand, N. C.
(American Journal of Botany. 2001;88:258-269.)
© 2001 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Nonlocal transplantation and outbreeding depression in the subshrub Lotus scoparius (Fabaceae)1

Arlee M. Montalvo4,2,3 and Norman C. Ellstrand3

2 Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 4955 Canyon Crest Drive, Riverside, California 92507 USA; 3 Department of Botany and Plant Sciences and Center for Conservation Biology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521-0124 USA

The genetic background of transplants used to create or augment wild populations may affect the long-term success of restored populations. If seed sources are from differently adapted populations, then the relative performance of progeny from crosses among populations may decrease with an increase in genetic differences of parents and in the differences of parental environments to the transplant location. We evaluated the potential for such outbreeding depression by hybridizing individuals from six different populations of Lotus scoparius var. scoparius and L. s. var. brevialatus. We used allozyme data to calculate genetic distances between source populations, and compiled climatic data and measured soil traits to estimate environmental distances between source populations. We found significant outbreeding depression following controlled crosses. In the greenhouse, the success of crosses (seeds/flower x seedlings/seed) decreased with increasing genetic distance between populations revealing genetically based outbreeding depression unrelated to local adaptation. After outplanting to one native site (in situ common garden), field cumulative fitness of progeny (survival x fruit production) decreased significantly with mean environmental distance of the parental populations to the transplant site, but not with genetic distance between the crossed populations. This result is consistent with a disruption of local adaptation. At the second, ecologically contrasting common garden, where low survival reduced statistical power, field cumulative fitness (survival x progeny height) did not decrease significantly with either environmental distance or genetic distance. Overall, intervariety crosses were 40 and 50% as fit (seeds/flower x seedlings/seed x survival x fruits at the first garden or x height at the second) as intravariety crosses. These results suggest that the cumulative outbreeding depression was caused by a combination of genetically based ecological differences among populations and other genomic coadaptation. We conclude that mixing genetically differentiated seed sources of Lotus scoparius may significantly lower the fitness of augmented or restored populations. Genetic and environmental similarities of source populations relative to the transplant site should be considered when choosing source materials, a practice recommended by recent seed transfer policies. Geographic separation was not a good surrogate for either of these measures.

Key Words: coastal sage scrub • common garden • cumulative fitness • ecological genetics • environmental distance • geographic distance • genetic distance • local adaptation • restoration • seed source




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
E. H. Mooney and J. B. McGraw
Effects of self-pollination and outcrossing with cultivated plants in small natural populations of American ginseng, Panax quinquefolius (Araliaceae)
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2007; 94(10): 1677 - 1687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
K. P. Vogel, A. A. Hopkins, K. J. Moore, K. D. Johnson, and I. T. Carlson
Genetic Variation among Canada Wildrye Accessions from Midwest USA Remnant Prairies for Biomass Yield and other Traits
Crop Sci., October 2, 2006; 46(6): 2348 - 2353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. Pelabon, M. L. Carlson, T. F. Hansen, and W. S. Armbruster
Effects of crossing distance on offspring fitness and developmental stability in Dalechampia scandens (Euphorbiaceae)
Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2005; 92(5): 842 - 851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
G. Colling, C. Reckinger, and D. Matthies
Effects of pollen quantity and quality on reproduction and offspring vigor in the rare plant Scorzonera humilis (Asteraceae)
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2004; 91(11): 1774 - 1782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. M. Rhode and J. Emmett Duffy
Seed production from the mixed mating system of Chesapeake Bay (USA) eelgrass (Zostera marina; Zosteraceae)
Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2004; 91(2): 192 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
E. Torres, J. M. Iriondo, and C. Perez
Vulnerability and determinants of reproductive success in the narrow endemic Antirrhinum microphyllum (Scrophulariaceae)
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2002; 89(7): 1171 - 1179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.