Am. J. Bot. Li-Cor Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grison-Pigé, L.
Right arrow Articles by Roy, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Grison-Pigé, L.
Right arrow Articles by Roy, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Grison-Pigé, L.
Right arrow Articles by Roy, J.
(American Journal of Botany. 2001;88:2214-2220.)
© 2001 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Reproductive Biology

Carbon allocation to volatiles and other reproductive components in male Ficus carica (Moraceae)1

Laure Grison-Pigé, Jean-Louis Salager, Martine Hossaert-McKey and Jacques Roy2

Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, CNRS, 1919 route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier Cedex 5, France

Volatile compounds are often mediators of plant–pollinator interactions. Their emission is presumed to be costly, but this cost has seldom been quantified. Figs of Ficus carica (a dioecious species) release volatile compounds when receptive, thus attracting the agaonid wasp Blastophaga psenes. In dioecious fig species, wasps lay eggs inside male figs and pollinate female ones. For a male tree, we estimated carbon allocation to reproduction using the annual growth module (AGM) as the unit of measurement. Over the growing season, leaf and fig carbon exchange and construction costs were measured, as well as carbon investment in stamens, provisioning pollinators, and biosynthesis and release of volatile compounds. Representativity of the tree studied was evaluated by measuring some of these parameters on seven other male fig trees. The results show that 7.6–16.4% of the carbon assimilated by leaves and figs was invested in reproduction. Of the carbon invested in reproduction, pollinator attraction and feeding represented only 0.08–0.12% and 1.84–2.33%, respectively, while pollinator sheltering (fig construction and respiration) represented 97.6–98.0%. In this strict and coevolved plant–pollinator association, the main male reproductive investment was thus in the structures sheltering the associated pollinators.

Key Words: Blastophaga psenes • carbon allocation • cost of reproduction • Ficus carica • Moraceae • mutualism • photosynthesis • reproductive effort • respiration • volatile compounds






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.