Am. J. Bot. Li-Cor Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhardwaj, M.
Right arrow Articles by Eckert, C. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bhardwaj, M.
Right arrow Articles by Eckert, C. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bhardwaj, M.
Right arrow Articles by Eckert, C. G.
(American Journal of Botany. 2001;88:2204-2213.)
© 2001 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Reproductive Biology

Functional analysis of synchronous dichogamy in flowering rush, Butomus umbellatus (Butomaceae)1

Michael Bhardwaj and Christopher G. Eckert2

Department of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6

Dichogamy is one of the most widespread floral mechanisms in flowering plants and is thought to have evolved to reduce interference between pollen import and export within flowers, especially self-pollination. Self-pollination between flowers may also be reduced if dichogamy is synchronous among flowers on an inflorescence. The analysis of dichogamy at both levels requires that the sexual phases of individual flowers be defined functionally in terms of pollen deposition and removal. We conducted morphological and functional analyses to investigate the degree of dichogamy within flowers and the synchronicity of dichogamy between flowers within inflorescences in an emergent, aquatic monocot, flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus). Based on daily observations of the development of marked flowers, data on the schedule of anther dehiscence within flowers, and repeat surveys of floral sex ratios in three populations, individual flowers appear to be strictly protandrous. On average, each flower spends ~1 d in each of male and female phases with an intervening 1-d neuter phase during which there is no available pollen in anthers and stigmas are not yet exposed to receive pollen. Morphological criteria used to delimit the beginning and end of each of these three sex phases were validated by quantifying the temporal schedule of pollen removal from anthers and pollen deposition on stigmas. Experimental pollinations showed that the morphological changes marking the end of female phase are hastened by pollen deposition. At the umbel level, synchronous development within sequential cohorts of flowers reduced overlap of male and female sexual phases between flowers. On average (±1 SE), 72 ± 3% of flowers completed their female phase while no other flowers on the same umbel were in male phase. Computer simulations of umbel development showed that this value is significantly higher than expected if the timing of flower development within umbels was random (30 ± 1%). Surveys of floral sex ratios in three populations revealed that 87% of umbels were either unisexual male or female at any given time. Pollinators usually visited more than one flower in sequence when foraging on umbels, suggesting that synchronous dichogamy may be an adaptation to avoid geitonogamy. The adaptiveness of both flower- and umbel-level dichogamy is also suggested because both traits are expressed to a lesser extent in obligately clonal, triploid populations, where flowers do not make seeds and hence floral adaptations are not maintained by natural selection.

Key Words: Butomaceae • Butomus umbellatus • dichogamy • floral longevity • flowering rush • pollen deposition • pollen removal • pollen tubes • pollination • pollinator visitation • temporal dioecism




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Hu, D. L. Dilcher, D. M. Jarzen, and D. Winship Taylor
Early steps of angiosperm pollinator coevolution
PNAS, January 8, 2008; 105(1): 240 - 245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
S. G. Michalski and W. Durka
Synchronous Pulsed Flowering: Analysis of the Flowering Phenology in Juncus (Juncaceae)
Ann. Bot., November 1, 2007; 100(6): 1271 - 1285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. M. Snyder and J. H. Richards
Floral phenology and compatibility of sawgrass, Cladium jamaicense (Cyperaceae)
Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2005; 92(4): 736 - 743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.