|
|
||||||||
Population Biology |
2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-2106 USA; 3Departmento de Botánica, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile; 4Department of Higher Plant Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Vienna, Austria; 5Department of Botany, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 54056-3433 USA; 6Departmento de Biología Molecular, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile; 7Department of Biology, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556-0369 USA; 8Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-3043 USA; 9Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal, C. C. 495, 5000 Córdoba, Argentina; 10Department of Botany, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
The level and apportionment of allozyme diversity were determined for 29 endemic (and 1 native) species from the Juan Fernández Islands, Chile. Mean diversities at the species level (Hes = 0.065) are low but comparable to those measured for other insular endemics in the Pacific. A high mean proportion (0.338) of species-level diversity resides among populations. Diversity statistics were compared for species in different ecologicallife history trait categories and abundance classes. Species occurring in large populations and those present in scattered small populations have higher diversities than species occurring in one or two populations. Although not significant with the conservative statistical test employed, lower diversity was found in highly selfing species as compared to animal- or wind-pollinated species. The apportionment of genetic diversity within and among populations (GST values) is not significantly different for any of the species categories. Of particular interest is the lack of difference between animal- and wind-pollinated species because previous analyses of large data sets showed higher differentiation between populations of animal- than wind-pollinated species. Historical factors, both ecological and phylogenetic in nature, can influence the level and apportionment of diversity within insular endemics, and thus ecological correlates of diversity seen in many continental species may not apply to endemics. The results have several conservation implications. The preservation of large populations or several small populations is important for conserving diversity within species because when species are reduced to one or two populations, allozyme diversity is sharply reduced. High mean GST values for the species examined illustrate the need for conserving as many populations as possible, either in the wild or in the garden, to preserve maximal diversity within species. Effective conservation strategies require empirical knowledge of each species.
Key Words: allozymes conservation genetic variation Juan Fernández Archipelago rare species
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Oliva-Tejera, J. Caujape-Castells, J. Navarro-Deniz, A. Reyes-Betancort, S. Scholz, M. Baccarani-Rosas, and N. Cabrera-Garcia Patterns of genetic divergence of three Canarian endemic Lotus (Fabaceae): implications for the conservation of the endangered L. kunkelii Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2006; 93(8): 1116 - 1124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Crawford, J. K. Archibald, A. Santos-Guerra, and M. E. Mort Allozyme diversity within and divergence among species ofTolpis(Asteraceae-Lactuceae) in the Canary Islands: systematic, evolutionary, and biogeographical implications Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2006; 93(4): 656 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Lee, S.-C. Kim, K. Lundy, and A. Santos-Guerra Chloroplast DNA phylogeny of the woody Sonchus alliance (Asteraceae: Sonchinae) in the Macaronesian Islands Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2005; 92(12): 2072 - 2085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Bernardello, R. Aguilar, and G. J. Anderson The reproductive biology of Sophora fernandeziana (Leguminosae), a vulnerable endemic species from Isla Robinson Crusoe Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2004; 91(2): 198 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |