|
|
||||||||
Systematics |
2Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, TW9 3DS UK; 3Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166 USA; 4Institut de Biotechnologie des Plantes, Batiment 630, Université de Paris XI, F-91405 Orsay, Cedex, France; and 5Department of Botany, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Bento Goncalves, 9500, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil
Iridaceae are one of the largest families of Lilianae and probably also among the best studied of monocotyledons. To further evaluate generic, tribal, and subfamilial relationships we have produced four plastid DNA data sets for 57 genera of Iridaceae plus outgroups: rps4, rbcL (both protein-coding genes), the trnL intron, and the trnL-F intergenic spacer. All four matrices produce similar although not identical trees, and we thus analyzed them in a combined analysis, which produced a highly resolved and well-supported topology, in spite of the fact that the partition homogeneity test indicated strong incongruence. In each of the individual trees, some genera or groups of genera are misplaced relative to morphological cladistic studies, but the combined analysis produced a pattern much more similar to these previous ideas of relationships. In the combined tree, all subfamilies were resolved as monophyletic, except Nivenioideae that formed a grade in which Ixioideae were embedded. Achlorophyllous Geosiris (sometimes referred to Geosiridaceae or Burmanniaceae) fell within the nivenioid grade. Most of the tribes were monophyletic, and Isophysis (Tasmanian) was sister to the rest of the family; Diplarrhena (Australian) fell in a well-supported position as sister to Irideae/Sisyrinchieae/Tigridieae/Mariceae (i.e., Iridoideae); Bobartia of Sisyrinchieae is supported as a member of Irideae. The paraphyly of Nivenioideae is suspicious due to extremely high levels of sequence divergence, and when they were constrained to be monophyletic the resulting trees were only slightly less parsimonious (<1.0%). However, this subfamily also lacks clear morphological synapomorphies and is highly heterogeneous, so it is difficult to develop a strong case on nonmolecular grounds for their monophyly.
Key Words: incongruence Iridaceae rbcL rps4 trnL trnL-F
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. D. Pirie, M. P. B. Vargas, M. Botermans, F. T. Bakker, and L. W. Chatrou Ancient paralogy in the cpDNA trnL-F region in Annonaceae: implications for plant molecular systematics Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2007; 94(6): 1003 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Duangjai, B. Wallnofer, R. Samuel, J. Munzinger, and M. W. Chase Generic delimitation and relationships in Ebenaceae sensu lato: evidence from six plastid DNA regions Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2006; 93(12): 1808 - 1827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Samuel, W. Gutermann, T. F. Stuessy, C. F. Ruas, H.-W. Lack, K. Tremetsberger, S. Talavera, B. Hermanowski, and F. Ehrendorfer Molecular phylogenetics reveals Leontodon (Asteraceae, Lactuceae) to be diphyletic Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2006; 93(8): 1193 - 1205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. V. Norup, J. Dransfield, M. W. Chase, A. S. Barfod, E. S. Fernando, and W. J. Baker Homoplasious character combinations and generic delimitation: a case study from the Indo-Pacific arecoid palms (Arecaceae: Areceae) Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2006; 93(7): 1065 - 1080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Carlsward, W. M. Whitten, N. H. Williams, and B. Bytebier Molecular phylogenetics of Vandeae (Orchidaceae) and the evolution of leaflessness Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2006; 93(5): 770 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kathriarachchi, R. Samuel, P. Hoffmann, J. Mlinarec, K. J. Wurdack, H. Ralimanana, T. F. Stuessy, and M. W. Chase Phylogenetics of tribe Phyllantheae (Phyllanthaceae; Euphorbiaceae sensu lato) based on nrITS and plastid matK DNA sequence data Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2006; 93(4): 637 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Haston, G. P. Lewis, and J. A. Hawkins A phylogenetic reappraisal of the Peltophorum group (Caesalpinieae: Leguminosae) based on the chloroplast trnL-F, rbcL and rps16 sequence data Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2005; 92(8): 1359 - 1371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. van den Berg, D. H. Goldman, J. V. Freudenstein, A. M. Pridgeon, K. M. Cameron, and M. W. Chase An overview of the phylogenetic relationships within Epidendroideae inferred from multiple DNA regions and recircumscription of Epidendreae and Arethuseae (Orchidaceae) Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2005; 92(4): 613 - 624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Mols, B. Gravendeel, L. W. Chatrou, M. D. Pirie, P. C. Bygrave, M. W. Chase, and P. J. A. Kessler Identifying clades in Asian Annonaceae: monophyletic genera in the polyphyletic Miliuseae Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 590 - 600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Davis and M. W. Chase Elatinaceae are sister to Malpighiaceae; Peridiscaceae belong to Saxifragales Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2004; 91(2): 262 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. C. Muschner, A. P. Lorenz, A. C. Cervi, S. L. Bonatto, T. T. Souza-Chies, F. M. Salzano, and L. B. Freitas A first molecular phylogenetic analysis of Passiflora (Passifloraceae) Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2003; 90(8): 1229 - 1238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Simpson, C. A. Furness, T. R. Hodkinson, A. M. Muasya, and M. W. Chase Phylogenetic relationships in Cyperaceae subfamily Mapanioideae inferred from pollen and plastid DNA sequence data Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2003; 90(7): 1071 - 1086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. Muellner, R. Samuel, S. A. Johnson, M. Cheek, T. D. Pennington, and M. W. Chase Molecular phylogenetics of Meliaceae (Sapindales) based on nuclear and plastid DNA sequences Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2003; 90(3): 471 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Pires and K. J. Sytsma A phylogenetic evaluation of a biosystematic framework: Brodiaea and related petaloid monocots (Themidaceae) Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2002; 89(8): 1342 - 1359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Cuenoud, V. Savolainen, L. W. Chatrou, M. Powell, R. J. Grayer, and M. W. Chase Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2002; 89(1): 132 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |