Am. J. Bot. Botany 2008 Ad
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maloof, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Maloof, J. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Maloof, J. E.
(American Journal of Botany. 2001;88:1960-1965.)
© 2001 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Reproductive Biology

The effects of a bumble bee nectar robber on plant reproductive success and pollinator behavior1

Joan E. Maloof2

Salisbury University, Department of Biological Sciences, Salisbury, Maryland 21801 USA and Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, Colorado 81224 USA

Interactions between a plant species (Corydalis caseana), a bumble bee nectar robber (Bombus occidentalis), and a bumble bee pollinator (B. appositus) were studied. There were no significant differences between naturally robbed and unrobbed flowers in fruit set or mean seed set per fruit. Plots of C. caseana plants were subjected to treatments of robbing and no robbing using commercially available colonies of B. occidentalis. Robbers did not pollinate the flowers. Pollinator behavior was observed to determine (1) the number of bees attracted to each plot, (2) the number of inflorescences visited in a plot, (3) the number of flowers visited on each inflorescence, and (4) the distance flown between inflorescences. There were no significant differences in the number of inflorescences visited per bee or the number of flowers visited per inflorescence per bee when robbed and unrobbed treatments were compared. Of the parameters measured, only distance flown between inflorescences differed in the robbed and the unrobbed treatments. Bees flew significantly further between inflorescences in the robbed plots than in the unrobbed plots. The results indicate that the nectar robbers have no negative effect on fruit set or seed set in C. caseana and that they may cause increased pollen flow distances by changing the behavior of the pollinator.

Key Words: Bombus • community ecology • Corydalis • flight distances • nectar robbing • outcrossing • robbers




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
L. A. Burkle, R. E. Irwin, and D. A. Newman
Predicting the effects of nectar robbing on plant reproduction: implications of pollen limitation and plant mating system
Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2007; 94(12): 1935 - 1943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.