|
|
||||||||
Reproductive Biology |
2Departamento de Biología de Organismos y Sistemas (Unidad de Ecología), Universidad de Oviedo, E-33071 Oviedo, Spain; 3Bournemouth University, School for Conservation Sciences, Dorset House, Talbot Campus, Fern Barrow, Poole, BH12 5BB UK
We studied the relative role of inflorescence traits, flowering synchrony, and pollination context for infructescence and fruit initiation in two Spanish populations of Arum italicum, a species in which inflorescences are the pollination unit. In this species, a specialized inflorescence organ, the appendix, is important for pollinator attraction. However, the short floral longevity and the production of mostly one inflorescence per plant make its pollination potentially dependent on strong flowering synchrony and on external factors not controlled by the plant (the pollination context). The flowering period in both sites lasted >3 mo. Day-to-day variation in simultaneous antheses was high, and 1150% of antheses occurred on days during which no pollen donor was present. Inflorescence traits, flowering synchrony, and between-plant distance all influenced infructescence and fruit initiation, but their relative importance differed between sites. In one large population, infructescence initiation was positively related to inflorescence traits; in a smaller population infructescence initiation increased with the number of donor inflorescences. In both sites, percentage of fruits initiated per infructescence was dependent on a combination of inflorescence traits, flowering synchrony, and between-plant distance. Plants producing 24 inflorescences had higher probability of infructescence initiation and overlapped their antheses with more plants than single-inflorescence ones.
Key Words: Araceae Arum italicum between-plant distance floral display flowering dynamics flowering synchrony inflorescence number pollination context
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Mendez Sexual mass allocation in species with inflorescences as pollination units: a comparison between Arum italicum and Arisaema (Araceae) Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2001; 88(10): 1781 - 1785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |