HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kaplan, D. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kaplan, D. R. Agricola Articles by Kaplan, D. R.

The science of plant morphology: definition, history, and role in modern biology¹

Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3102 USA

As a scientific discipline, plant morphology is 211 yr old, originated by Goethe in 1790. It is a discipline that has largely been Germanic in practice. Because it took its origins from the study of the natural history of plants and the United States is principally an engineering society, the discipline of plant morphology in its pure form has never been widely practiced in this country. What has been labeled "plant morphology" in the United States has served largely as a handmaiden for systematics, using morphological characteristics to carve up diversity into its systematic subunits. Because the heart of plant morphology as a science is a focus on the convergences rather than the homologies in a phylogenetic sense, the German tradition of plant morphology is a unifying science that focuses on fundamental themes that transcend systematic boundaries. This paper traces the history of the science of plant morphology through the lineage of its principal practitioners: Goethe, Hofmeister, von Goebel, and Troll. It also evaluates the principles of plant morphology by applying them to the phyletically diverse Pteridophytes, showing that contemporary members of that group exhibit levels of shoot organization comparable to that of seed plants and discusses the implications of these findings.

Key Words: Goethe • Hofmeister • megaphyll • microphyll • plant morphology • primary thickening growth • Pteridophytes • systematics • Troll • von Goebel

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Barthelemy and Y. Caraglio Plant Architecture: A Dynamic, Multilevel and Comprehensive Approach to Plant Form, Structure and Ontogeny Ann. Bot., March 1, 2007; 99(3): 375 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Heuret, C. Meredieu, T. Coudurier, F. Courdier, and D. Barthelemy Ontogenetic trends in the morphological features of main stem annual shoots of Pinus pinaster (Pinaceae) Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2006; 93(11): 1577 - 1587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Kelly and T. J. Cooke Geometrical relationships specifying the phyllotactic pattern of aquatic plants Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2003; 90(8): 1131 - 1143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. M. S. Smith and S. Hake The Interaction of Two Homeobox Genes, BREVIPEDICELLUS and PENNYWISE, Regulates Internode Patterning in the Arabidopsis Inflorescence PLANT CELL, August 1, 2003; 15(8): 1717 - 1727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. BARET, E. NICOLINI, T. LE BOURGEOIS, and D. STRASBERG Developmental Patterns of the Invasive Bramble (Rubus alceifolius Poiret, Rosaceae) in Reunion Island: an Architectural and Morphometric Analysis Ann. Bot., January 1, 2003; 91(1): 39 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]